⭐️ZERO STARS ⭐️
I disliked this entire book. I can’t see this as being beneficial, much less a good suicide prevention read.. 🤷🏻♂️ this book is horrible and depressing.
I didn’t care for the whole chapter on gun control. gun control won’t solve everything. Quit preaching it like it will.
Here are some quotes direct from the book that I just couldn’t NOT point out.🙄🤦🏻♂️
📚"We think we're born and are going to die, but that's an illusion. I was thirteen when my father died. I thought he'd disappeared, but he didn't. My father is still here. When I look deeply, I can see him in my consciousnes, in my life today. We human beings are magnificent. We cannot die or even disappear.”
👉WHAT?! What kind of sense does this make? This is just weird. ‘I can see him in my consciousness’?! What the hell.. 🤦🏻♂️
📚“In war, mass shootings, suicide, and every kind of violence, everyone loses. If you kill yourself, you are killing me too. Please don't kill me. I want to live and I want to love. If we can learn to love ourselves and each other, the whole world wins. To love means to live.”
👉What kind of crap is this? “If YOu KiLL YOuRsElF You’RE KILLiNg ME ToO. plEAse DOn’T kiLL mE!” 🥺😭👉👈🥺
Oh, that’s REALLY gonna stop someone from shooting up a school or cashier (NOT)! Are you serious? This book is ridiculous.
📚“When you walk into a room and think it’s the same room you were in last week, you're not perceiving correctly. You've never seen this room before. It's different from the one you were in last week. If you see me and think I'm the person I was last week, you're not seeing me either. I'm not the same. There's no repetition in life. If you're truly present and really experiencing something, you'll recognize that it's new, different from anything you've seen or heard before. If it feels the same, IT’S NOT REAL. It's a replica of something you experienced earlier, a product of your mind, NOT REALITY.”
👉This whole paragraph is just BS. A person can work in an office cubicle for 12 years… and you know damn well it’s the same cubicle it was 12 years ago. This guy is trying really hard to be trendy, but his analogies just aren’t good. It’s just the way he writes that’s just trash. It’s like reading a mom’s blog.. trying to be relevant and give advice, even though no one wants it from her.
📚“If you tell me that you and your partner don't love each other anymore and I nod in agreement, I'm not listening. I'm just a recording device repeating what you said, and I need to listen again.”
👉WHAT THE HELL?!?!?! Then WHY did you NOD???? This book is so crap. 😂 😛
📚“If you sit with your spine upright, there's more space in your chest to breathe easily. Breathe in and out consciously, and come back to yourself, finding your stability. Sitting straight like this, you can listen to yourself and others for hours without losing your sovereignty. You can distinguish what's happening now from what happened in the past-to you and perhaps to your ancestors who are inviting you to transform the family trauma.”
👉Welp, you heard him, folks! Sit up straight and all your problems will disappear! It’s just because you needed more room in your lungs to breathe! (NOT!!)
This is so dumb, I’m sorry. I’ve listened to yogis and other wise people who practice Love and meditation, and they have not said dumb crap like this. 🤷🏻♂️
📚“A photo of New York taken a hundred years ago is different from one taken today, and neither is the real city. Both are mere representations. You, too, are different from yesterday, and so is everyone and everything. Unless you see your loved ones now, in the present moment, as they actually are, you won't know happiness.”
👉So you’re telling me that a photo of New York is not the real city of New York? What kind of crap is that? I understand that the author is trying to be deep and have people see more than face value, but this statement is ridiculous.
And then he talks about seeing your loved ones in the present moment or you won’t know true happiness… ugh, this is so weird. So is he saying I can’t look at a picture of my grandson or my nieces, because those are just dumb “representations“? 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ This whole book feels contradicting and weird. It’s also Judgey and preachy..
📚“We see a rope and think it's a snake. Someone might hear a car backfire; a veteran might think they're back in combat, while another person might reexperience the feelings of growing up in a violent household. Believing that suffering will follow these triggers, we miss things of value. The same mechanism that helps us avoid harm can also cause us to avoid happiness. When we run away from perceived dangers, or from our
feelings about them, we also avoid joy and pleasure. We need to treat suffering as neutral. Most difficulties are best addressed when we don't run away.”
👉I have one word: WHAT?!?!
‘Believing that suffering will follow these triggers, we miss things of value’….
So, i’m supposed to just throw away all my memories of trauma just so I can hear a car backfire or see a rope? You can see where this guy’s theory is just crappy. Sure, you should live every single day and try to enjoy everything, even the small things, but you’re ALLOWED TO BE SCARED OR FREAK OUT! No one can just turn off their triggers like that…
Yeah, hearing a car backfire and that being my trigger is REALLY MAKING ME MISS OUT ON JOY (NOT!!!) 🤦🏻♂️ 🤦🏻♂️ 🤦🏻♂️
‘Most difficulties are best addressed when we don't run away’…. So I’m supposed to sit still when I’m being verbally abused, hurt by something, or if I’m in a dangerous situation…? Just so I can say later that I didn’t run away? Where’s the logic?
📚“If you want to cool the flames of anger-to defuse the bomb in our heart- the first step is to recognize anger as anger, neither good nor bad. There's no need to suppress or transform it.”
👉Anger isn’t good OR bad? Give me a break.
📚“[I] shared everything. If I had candy, I would offer some to my classmates. When I arrived in Holland, I saw a boy eating a chocolate bar all alone. It was my first taste of culture shock. Later I realized it wasn't about Dutch culture, it was about modern economics. People have forgotten the joy of sharing. When everyone has more than enough, sharing gets lost in the shufle.”
👉Dude sees a kid enjoying a candy bar and has culture shock? Give. Me. A. Break.
No, if he noticed a lot of people not sharing, ON PURPOSE, I can understand that. But he sees ONE child eating a chocolate bar and is offended that he didn’t share with him? How about, the kid WAS ALONE, not with a family member or friend…. He’s not gonna run around with his snack and make sure to share it with random people! 🤦🏻♂️
There is only one part of this book that caught my attention:
“Suffering is evidence
of your capacity to love”
That might sometimes be true.
Especially like when you love people or animals a lot and they pass away. But this quote doesn’t apply to all suffering.
Why did I continue to read this even though I didn’t like it? I really don’t know. I have an issue sometimes where I have to finish a book I started. Since this book was extremely short, I thought “what the hell” and just finished it.
I would never read this again or recommend it to anyone.
I know this review might sound really hateful, but it’s simply my opinion and I really am all about spreading love. This guy’s writing and ideas are just not my jam.
If you want to read a cool book about life, happiness, and life's trials (that does NOT have a depressing theme), please read Rules for a Knight - Ethan Hawke!
It's a short read like this book is!