I finally finished it! This is the first economics textbook I bought in English almost twenty... years ago. However, back then my level of English was not sufficient to go through the book and I just let it dust in my bookcase. I got my economics and politics degree, but I decided to follow the politics/international relations path in my postgraduate studies. During the last academic year I was asked to teach economics to law/politics undergraduates at a very basic level. Oh well... It had to be done. This is when I decided I wanted to read the book, despite the fact the 13th edition was published in 1996, since in terms of basic economic theory it is still valid.
I have to say that the textbook was really accessible and it covered many different aspects of both micro and macro. There has been an enormous effort to contain as much as possible in a textbook and explain it as clearly as possible. On the other hand, I believe that the authors should have been more selective, since there is no need to overburden the students with chapters that are not necessary for an introduction to economics course (such as the economics of health care, for example). The different theories are well explained, but I found the microeconomics chapters much better than the macroeconomics ones. Perhaps the biggest drawback is that the the structure of the 13th edition of the book is really really awkward; starting with a number of general chapters, then macro, then banking, then micro and then public economics and international economics. Just to show how irrational the structure is, there is a bit of international economics in the beginning (chapter 6) and then again 600 pages later towards the end of the book (Chapters 37 and 38). It makes so much more sense to start with micro, followed by macro and then proceed with other chapters and units that are not that important from a basic economic theory perspective. In any case, I hope this has been improved in subsequent editions. Finally, the textbook is really US-centric. It would be better if it was more open to examples from other parts of the world. I am glad I read it, though (even the archaic chapter on Russia as a transition economy, since it gave me a very nice view of the relevant debates back then - we are talking about the mid-1990s).
All in all, I would have given it 2 1/2 stars if possible. I now need to find my university professors and tell them that all their efforts were not in vain. I can still read and understand economic theory. As a matter of fact, I can even teach it! ;)