Foreword: In late November 2022, the Chinese public shocked the world with intense street protests nationwide that had not been seen since 1989. Triggered by the tragic loss of 10 lives in an apartment fire in Urumqi and the fact that the tragedy could have been avoided had the country's zero-Covid policy left open a slim but vital evacuation pathway, the protestors directed their anger not only at the reality of lockdown, but at the state leadership that thirstily took advantage of the public health crisis to intensify biopolical monitoring over the population. The technological sophistication of movement tracking, facial recognition, biometric collection, and the algorithms-aided prediction of everyday behavior connects the Han Chinese areas to the hinterland labor camps in Xinjiang, from which arose a capitalist economy through the ethno-racialization of Uyghurs and the "War on Terror" rhetoric imported from post-9/11 US.
While western media scrambled to report on the rare eruption of Chinese protests -- many critics struggled to find the right tone and focus as empathizing with an anti-lockdown campaign would risk lending anti-vaccine right-wingers a convenient source to attack liberalism -- the connection between the street scene and what Darren Byler calls the "recent global developments in capitalist frontier making" is completely lost. The obsession with the "China crisis" once again evades the foundational problem of capitalism: the construction of race in frontier-making agendas. Seen in this light, what was even more sensational (if on a lesser scale) of the protests than reinvigorating the memory of 1989 was the connection drawn by a minority of the Han protestors between themselves and the imprisoned Uyghurs, a grave connection conditioned in the colonial-capitalist violence of the penal state and its necroeconomy (the economy of death).
Review -
In the short-lived moments (1990s-early 2000s) of limited autonomy of self-fashioning, the Uyghur and Kazakh homeland in Northwest China teemed with renewed desires for cosmopolitanism. One such desire, looking east to China's Pacific coast, was to find ways to join the mainstream Han-Chinese middle class through education. Another, looking west to Central Asia and the Middle East, sought connections with the global Islamic contemporaneity. This narrow window of "relaxed" governing was sandwiched between the sweeping socialist revolution and Maoist multiculturalism from the 1950s to the 70s, and a tightening labor and affective expropriation on the ground of killing "religious extremism" in its cradle starting from the 2010s. Darren Byler's Terror Capitalism focuses on the contemporary wing of Han settlement in Xinjiang. It analyzes the high-tech-aided devaluation and expropriation of the land-based Uyghur Muslim social reproduction with an empathetic focus on the main target of the "People's War on Terror" circa 2014: the rural male Uyghur body.
Roughly the size of Alaska, Xinjiang -- literally "new territory" -- stands at the pivotal location between China, Russia, and Central Asia and is historically regarded as a key passage of trade between Asia and Europe known from the Chinese end as the Silk Road. With trade came the orbits of multiple religions, but it was Islam that stayed and prospered the most. Xinjiang's religious and economic connectedness with the Middle East and Turkey remains to be a threat to the totalizing governance of Han-dominated China, with the potential of destabilizing the Eurasian trade pipeline on which a significant part of contemporary Chinese economy is built. Following the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991, the independence of the Central Asian republics both posed greater challenges of political stability from the "rising tensions regarding Uyghur desires for greater self-determination" and opened "new zones for building Chinese influence" with a significantly undermined rivalry from the Soviet empire that no longer exists. Having a thorough and undisrupted control of the Uyghur population, not to physically terminate, but to transform it through social engineering into a human warehouse of disposable but highly disciplined and productive workforce that some Han officials call "the carrier of economic stability," could secure for the Chinese state an advantageous access to the Eurasian trade corridor and rich natural resources.
What is immensely disturbing about the penal island that Xinjiang has become in comparison to other multi- and cross-national expropriation of racialized labor a nation-state has committed is the ways in which state capital and private interests are combined to form and popularize a nationalist settler mindset. In what may seem a paradox, the private Chinese tech enterprises involved in producing speculative venture capital are simultaneously driven by state capital to expand their market and not always pursuing immediate profitization. In other words, the personalization of ethnocentric statism, consisting of lowest-level migrant police contractors equipped with "smart" surveillance apparatuses, extends Maoist mobilization of class struggle to techno-capitalist frontier-making that eats into Uyghur social reproduction. This scheme, euphemized by the title of "Aid Xinjiang," is to draw near an "imagined future of Chinese cultural homogeneity," in which all economic individualization, Han or otherwise, melts into state capital.
The "user experience" -- as Byler bitterly calls it -- of the multi-scalar Chinese capitalist-colonial system ranges from forced dining of non-halal food and the ban of Uyghur language to property laws and education systems, from ban on religious activity and outfits to police brutality and mass incarceration. Practicing varied forms of carceral urbanism and banishment, the Han Chinese settler colonial agenda has managed to pack the centuries-long sufferings of Native Americans and African slaves into a short decade or two. With ostensible infrastructure and cheap and redundant human labor of surveillance, the material and digital enclosure has created "an unfree proletarianization of Muslim populations and at the same time institutionalizes a new social order." What is hellish and apocalyptic to the minority inmates is built to be a haven for lower-level Han migrant entrepreneurs to leave behind the class-based discrimination they experience in the coastal metropolises.
It is worth noting that the new (post-1980s) arrivals of the fortune-driven Han settlers form a new socioeconomic norm that excludes the older generation of Han migrants, pejoratively called the "blind wanderers," who followed the Maoist People’s Construction and Production Corps to Xinjiang in the 1950s. While the latter cared to learn the Uyghur language and culture and foster genuine inter-ethnic friendship in the absence of class difference, the former is mainly incentivized by the original accumulation of capital. But even the most Uyghur-friendly blind wanderers of Han origin can only come close to, but never reach, the epistemic gist of Uyghur musapir (traveler). Nonetheless, a decolonial friendship can still be cultivated between the blind wanderers and the musapirs to form what Byler calls a "minor politics": an intimate solidarity in everyday life between the colonized subjects and the minority within the ethno-racial majority who drift away from the ideology of supremacy.
Rarely is an academic writing so full of compassion, but Byler did it, and in an intentional gesture of decolonizing institutionalized knowledge production, of ways of being human. As he later reflected on the time he, a white male, built friendship over the years with the Uyghur men he interviewed and helplessly watched them disappeared one after another into the reeducation camps, Byler resonated with the sentiment that "anthropology is the work of mourning." Inspired by decolonial Native and feminist scholarship, his research does not overlook the toxic patriarchy and masculinity Uyghur men impose on Uyghur women. But neither does he let his interpretation of the gendered social reproduction of Uyghur lifeways be overriden by the universalist liberal feminism that makes abstract all historical contexts and, as a result, reinforces the colonial agenda of knowledge production. Any future study of Uyghur women in the camps or the larger unfree enclosure cannot achieve the necessary contextualization of Uyghur femininities without a historically specific interpretation of the critically important homosocial bonding between Uyghur men that saves at least some of them from losing the last bit of sanity and dignity. Before asking "what happened to Uyghur/Muslim (here fill in any "disposable/replaceable" ethnicity) women?" one should repeat after Lila Abu-Lughod, "Do Muslim Women Need Saving?" The masterminds and common "soldiers" of the Global/People's War on Terror have confirmed.