מלחמת וייטנאם הסתיימה בתבוסה הצבאית הגדולה ביותר שידעה ארצות הברית מעודה. מאז ועד היום עמלו המשטר האמריקאי ומלומדיו האינטלקטואלים להתגבר על התסמונת שזכתה לשם "תסמונת וייטנאם" – חשש מצד קובעי המדיניות בארצות הברית שכל מבצע צבאי רחב היקף עלול להפוך ל"תסבוכת" ולעורר התנגדות המונית מבית. ספרו של ג'ו אלן בוחן את לקחי תקופת וייטנאם מבעד לעיניו של אדם שהוא גם היסטוריון מסור וגם פעיל נמרץ בתנועת ההתנגדות למלחמה בימינו.
לא זו בלבד שאלן מנתץ את המיתולוגיה המקובלת ביחס למלחמה הארוכה ביותר שניהלה ארצות הברית עד ימינו, הוא גם עוסק בשלושה גורמים שמילאו תפקיד מרכזי בהנסתה של ארצות הברית מווייטנאם: ההתנגדות הווייטנאמית, תנועת ההתנגדות למלחמה בארצות הברית והמרד האמיץ של חיילי ארצות הברית נגד הפיקוד הצבאי האמריקאי.
לצד הצגת הרקע ההיסטורי-פוליטי לכניסת ארצות הברית למלחמה ותיאור זוועות המלחמה שחולל הצבא האמריקאי בווייטנאם, אלן חושף את ההיסטוריה המודחקת של מרד החיילים ואת יחסיו הדינמיים עם תנועת השלום העולמית. הוא מתאר את המאבק לזכויות האזרח, של שחורים ולבנים, שסייע להוליד תנועה מאורגנת ופעילה של התנגדות למלחמה; הוא מראה כיצד היחלשותה של התמיכה במלחמה הן בארצות הברית והן בשורות הצבא שיתקה את הממסד הצבאי והפוליטי החזק בעולם, עד שלא היה יכול להיאבק בלוחמה הנחושה של הווייטנאמים.
The focus of this book is not on the war itself, but on the counter-reaction to it in the US and how the US government dealt with the war.
Of course, the book is written from a left perspective and rightly accuses the US administration no less than war crimes and even genocide. From the book (and probably from any book that has dealt with and will deal with this war), it seems that most of the participants in that war, with the exception of the Vietnamese, very quickly stopped understanding what they were fighting for and why. That's always the strongest feeling you get from reading or watching any document about this war.
The book is written in simplicity and a flow that reminds me a bit of Anthony Bieber's books, but I must point out that I did not learn many new things that I had not already seen in Ken Burns' fascinating documentary.
The book links Vietnam to Iraq, and it's fascinating to read about all the madness that took place then on the civilian side as well, now that we are after a crazy year in which the Trump regime has taken many demons out of the bottle. The events of Black Life Mater and the Capitol Hill remind us once again of the fragility of the American society and the echoes of the split that accompanied the Vietnam War. Maybe what we see now is still, after so many years, a the result of that war.
Very readable, concise history, great for people looking to learn about the subject in a way that isn't excusing US imperialism and violence. Very timely read; the chapters on protests could be written today about US crackdown on anti gen0cide protests.
I'd honestly recommend skipping the first two chapters, which are diatribes against American atrocities that anyone who would pick up a book from Haymarket is hopefully familiar with. The remaining ~140 pages though have lots of useful anecdotes and data about the extent of radicalism outside of just the student movement, but it's by no means a conclusive overview of the cultural impact of the war.
As the disaster in Iraq continued to be compared with Vietnam, Allen set out to illuminate the history of that conflict, having been obscured by time and distorted by decades of pop culture and political propaganda. Even if you think you know all about it, this book should be read.
By no means exhaustive, this is still a cogent, clear-eyed account that includes the history of colonization in Vietnam and tracks the U.S. involvement since the end of World War II. It examines the results of the war on the ground in Vietnam, in the halls of U.S. power, on campuses, in the streets, in work places, and in the media.
Recommended.
"The devastation wreaked by the United States on Vietnam should have put to rest once and for all the myth of the United States as a nation committed to upholding freedom and democracy throughout the world."
A lesson to be learned from this history also includes the fact that the rhetoric of those in power has never changed. The cops still say and do the same things to demonstrators--same overblown warnings about "violent" protestors, same brutal tactics, same excuses afterwards. The politicians say the same things about lights at the ends of tunnels and freedom and so on. The press dutifully reports. The liberals fear radical action more than the evils of war. The democrats twist themselves into antiwar candidates even though they support the venture overseas. The poor, working class, and people of color do the dirty work.
What did change, with regards to the so-called War on Terror, is that after mass protests prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the antiwar sentiment and action seemed to disappear rather than increase like during the war on Vietnam.
Joe Allen's brief summation of the U.S. war in Vietnam is an excellent and compact history of both the U.S. war of aggression, as well as the domestic revolution that occurred at home. With excellent precision and historical breadth Allen reviews the context of French colonialism in Vietnam, followed by the US' multiple attempts to reclaim the former colony, namely military funding and support, followed by an air invasion, followed by the full-scale deployment of troops. Allen traces the web of deceit that flowed from the Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations, which culminated in the secret bombing of Cambodia. Allen demonstrates quite lucidly, how the war was stopped through a combination of resistance at home, NLF resistance, and GI resistance. There are excellent descriptions of the Black Power movement, as well as the rise of working class militancy in the 1970's. Allen demolishes the myth that opposition to the US war was primarily student/intellectual led, and demonstrates that opposition to the war was overwhelmingly led by the working classes. Perhaps the only thing that is missing in this account is an analysis of the economic considerations of US policy makers. Still, an excellent work of history.
This book highlights what were the major questions, movements, conflicts in the U.S. involved in the build up to the Anti-Vietnam War Movement. It brings into view the debates of Black Civil Rights and Liberation groups, Unions and the Left in relationship to war. It addresses the three key elements that forced the US out of Vietnam: the resistance of the courageous Vietnamese, the anti-war movement in the US and the courageous and suppressed rebellion of soldiers against US military command. Most importantly Allen stresses opposition to the war was there from the beginning of the war. This is a very timely book to read!!!
Based on me throwing a lot of questions to my husband while reading this book, it is accurate and very informative for those of us who were not there. I learned a lot about the US Government, the good and the bad.