I read this because I am doing a project for my intellectual freedom class for my Master's in library science. And yes, I am giving him a much lower score because I think he's patently wrong. No. 1 it is for his assertion that almost all Americans hold true to the traditional Christian values of a "moral upbringing." First of all, one can have a virtuous and moral upbringing without being "Christian." One can also grow up an asshole if one is Christian. I've known plenty of every kind. Ones religion does not necessarily dictate how good or bad a person is.
Second - there's a lot to value in the "liberal materials." Conservatives look at something and see dirt, filth and sin. They don't look deeper to the true meaning of the book, work of art or film. They just see on the surface. Mr. Bennett would have us teach our children that most things are bad, only the things we hand you are good and you should never listen to what one of those terrible liberals tells you. Therefore, they attempt to prevent everyone else from being able to give their children the education they feel is best. Before you get all up in arms and scream at me for being an awful liberal, hear me out. Yes... there are materials that are not exactly literary. We should not, as Mr. Bennett asserts, defend something worthless just because it's there. If I am a collection development librarian, I am going to judge the book on all its content. If it's not deemed worth having it in a collection, I won't get it for that collection. That doesn't mean the first f-bomb is going to put it on the out list. And that doesn't mean a rape scene is going to put it on the out list. A child can be taught values by being exposed to things other than Jesus. We should prepare them for the world in which they will have to live. We should prepare them for the bad things and the good. Sheltering them forces them into isolation. Mr. Bennett makes some good points, but he is way off the mark. I gave him an extra star for his occasional good points. He just fails to realize there's such a thing as the 1st Amendment. Jesus was a long time ago. The Constitution was a little more recent in history. He did seem to think history was an important part of education. He should remember that part. However, Mr. Bennett - here's my message to you and I will get dirty with this one, because I offer you no credit where this is concerned:
You said, "From what I have observed, the liberal elite proceed from a certain social and political predisposition. The predisposition tends to be an adopted orientation, not a conclusion based on evidence and argument." Ok, Mr. Bennett. How many pages of sources were in the back of your book? Ok, geez... I forgot, I need to look. Ok, yes, you quoted the occasional conservative think-tank in the text, but there are, oh yeah: NO PAGES OF CITATIONS. You did not reference court cases, scientific studies, or scholarly papers in a sources cited section. Why? Do you not want us looking up your so called facts? The last book I read on intellectual freedom from a what you call LIBERAL scholar, had over 100 pages... yes, you read that right... 100 PAGES!!!!... of sources cited. This was Ms. Marjorie Heins. I reviewed the book just about a week ago. Feel free to look back in my history. Then again, she is just operating from a false predisposition and has no evidence. That's right. You said so... duh... I believe you. And yes, I do realize William Bennett will not actually read this review. It just makes me feel better to say what I would love for him to hear!