Tim Clarkson’s work on the the Picts is a terrifically executed history. It’s comprehensive and detailed, yet concise. Considering that serious studies of the Picts as a historic, rather than mythical, people did not take off until the 1950s, what has been pieced together about their culture, their history, their kings, their obscure and mysterious stones, and their wars is impressive.
My copy of the book is the 2017 version, which provides a postscript to the original 2008 publication, detailing recent Pictish archaeology and discoveries that impact a few of the things discussed earlier in the book. These are things such as findings on their centers of power, recently uncovered strongholds, hypotheses on the meanings of the symbols found on Pictish standing stones, and an excavation in the realm of the “Galloway Picts”, a region where, according to legend and history, the Picts resided despite being far to the south of their usual territory. The discovery suggests the Pictish symbols in this area are authentic and from the period, rather than later fabrications. Whether these were created by Picts, though, is still a matter of debate.
Clarkson covers the earliest written history mentioning the Picts and their ancestors, the Caledonians, through Bede’s somewhat contemporary writings on the Pictish people, and later times, to the coming of the Vikings. All outsider views, we get a picture of the people as an exotic, alien Barbarian race, strange and unknowable, dangerous and primitive and warlike. Like Stuart McHardy in his A New History of the Picts, Clarkson points to bias, propaganda, and questionable veracity in these sources, but picks them apart to leave us with what scholars tend to believe are nuggets of truth.
Along with the Irish annals, the Pictish king-lists, various works of hagiography, legends, biographical pieces, monastic sources of authentic history, and archaeological evidence, Clarkson presents a pleasantly coherent and organized narrative of the Picts. Around the year 550 AD the written documents concerning the Picts become more reliable and clear. Before this is mostly legend, propaganda, and pseudohistory. After this we get many reliable records.
He is careful about how to interpret the evidence, what data is available and what it is able to say, and makes no pretension of being able to provide a wholly consistent picture of a people who were all but lost to history.
From their early Roman encounters we get faithful reconstructions of the battles and events that shaped the early Pictish civilization. The place of the Picts in the broader context of sub-Roman Britain is discussed at length, as well as their activity long after the fall of the Roman Empire, and their emergence into what are commonly called the Dark Ages. Clarkson sees this era better described as the Early Historic period. He uses this term because it better represents the character of Europe after the departure of the Romans, as the distinct peoples began developing their own written histories and cultures in the absence of Roman control.
Setting out from here we get an analysis of Pictish society, their mysterious and legendary kings, the saints who missioned to their lands and established churches and cults, like Ninnian and Columba, and the centuries of development and conflict with neighboring peoples. The hypothesis of matrilineal succession in Pictish nobility is looked at closely. It is still not known if the Picts followed matrilineal or patrilineal succession but the king-list seems to suggest the former. Over time, however, the Pict kings became more evidently decided by fathers and sons and brothers instead of mothers and nephews and cousins.
How the Picts interacted with the Scots, their closest neighbors, and how the ruling of both people sometimes seemed to fall under a single ruler is a problem still being unraveled. There is a fog and a complexity to this period that resists easy interpretation.
Regardless, historians have made progress and our understanding of the extremely dynamic and confusing king-list, which is replete with contradictions, frequently recurring names belonging to different people, vague reports, and other complicating factors is getting better.
The strife of these pre-medieval lands is put under the microscope, and Clarkson does an excellent job portraying all the vicious drama and battle and confusion and shifting of power that plays out from the late fifth century to the early tenth century. Some of the most remarkable Pictish kings are examined closely, their reigns explained, showing their parts in major historic events. There is great attention given to Brude Son of Maelchon, whose thirty year reign saw the coming of Columba and the first recorded war between the Scots and Picts. Maelchon is a man who doesn’t appear in the king list, but his name and existence is a great mystery that takes a few pages of fascinating discussion to try to sort out.
Other kings given significant space here are men who share similar names, but very different reigns and fates: Talorc, Talorcan, Drust, Brude, Gartnait, Nechtan, Oengus, and Constantine, ending with the infamous Cináed Mac Ailpín, better known as Kenneth MacAlpin, ruler of the Scots (and last ruler of the Picts) under whom the Picts and Scots united as one to fend off the Vikings.
Brutal wars with Northumbria, the Britons, the Scots, as well as delicate treaties and unifications against greater enemies, like the Vikings and the Danes, make for fantastic stories. The final century of the Pictish society as a society independent of the Scots is a turbulent time. Something called the Treachery of Scone is a semi-legendary event said to be undertaken by Cináed Mac Ailpín, in which he invited the Picts to a lavish feast, got them drunk, and then had them slaughtered while they were inebriated.
This, according to medieval Scottish legend, was how the Picts disappeared from history. This never happened, and we know that the Picts and Scots became one people, with the Pictish language and customs and culture slowly diminishing and being supplanted by the Scottish ways. It is thought that if the dynamic of the Viking raids had been different, it might have been the Scot, instead of Pictish customs and language that disappeared.
The Picts became little more than legends and myths for centuries. Their small underground dwellings discovered by later Scottish people were taken to imply the Picts were tiny pygmies, giving rise to Scottish folklore of the ancient pygmies. The book closes with a great breakdown of how our understanding of the Picts has evolved from myth to fact, how it continues to grow, and Clarkson supplements the work with multiple maps, king lists, historical event summaries, and important genealogies.