3.5*
I wanted to love this book. In fact, I expected that I would. But I just didn’t. I’m not sure whether it was the writing style which I just didn’t find gripping, or maybe that it’s a general summary that didn’t really bring a great amount of depth or anything much new to the table. Maybe it’s the fact I’ve read a few really interesting books on sexism and politics lately and Sex, Lies and Question Time just didn’t match up to them? I suspect it’s a combination of these.
I did appreciate that Ellis provides the audience with some good examples of the poor treatment of women, even though many of these have been well documented in the media. But what was good was to hear the opinions of the women involved, and hear some behind the scenes details to create a full picture. The first chapter focuses on statistics and the history of women in politics which helps to provide a broader context for everything that has been achieved, and all the work required to make the future brighter for women.
Chapters focus on the sexualisation and harassment of women (particularly through gossip and sexual rumours), slut shaming, emphasis on female appearance, social media, cross party women’s alliances and family (particularly raising children). Much of this was disturbing to read about, but of course unsurprising, especially due to the revelations in recent years on the treatment of women in parliament. Ellis details the ways in which women are personally and professionally destroyed not only by their opponents and the media, but even by those within their own party.
Importantly it is acknowledged that the situation is much harder for women of different races, sexuality and those with disabilities. Penny Wong herself states that in her experience, treatment regarding her race and sexuality are more difficult to deal with because it’s not shared unlike with gender. I’m glad this is briefly referred to even though the focus of this book is on the treatment of women specifically. Part of that is because I find it difficult to sympathise with some of the women Ellis interviews precisely because of their own treatment of other women, and the policies they produce and endorse that make the lives of many women and minorities more difficult.
However, I did very much enjoy the points of view of many of the women, and especially the bluntness of Tanya Plibersek and intelligence of Penny Wong. I also decidedly agree with some of Plibersek’s opinions on cross party women’s committees, because it is difficult to argue they must have a lot in common just because they’re women – primarily because their stances on a wide range of issues and policies markedly differ. Not to mention the ways in which women are weaponised by their own parties to do the dirty work against their female opponents.
Of course, it wouldn’t be a book about sexism in the Australian parliament without a thorough discussion on what PM Julia Gillard went through. Much of this information was known at the time, however all of the new details were a welcome addition. The perspectives of women in parliament during her prime ministership was of principal interest, including their opinions regarding what they would do differently next time.
I remember being in highschool when Gillard became PM, and as someone who paid a bit of attention to politics, you couldn’t help but notice the undercurrent of misogyny that became a major part of the national discourse for years. Not to mention how her misogyny speech really became a defining moment for so many young girls and women.
In short, Sex, Lies and Question Time is a good book to gain an overall picture of sexism in Australian politics, although in my opinion it fails to add much new to the national discussion. I enjoyed the perspectives of many current and former female politicians, although I did find it difficult to feel any sympathy towards some of the women who have a history of ruining the lives of those less fortunate.