An excellent read covering the history of Latin American dependency theories through the intertwined theories and practices of the cepalinos and dependentistas, as well as their inherent tensions, and centres those who had traditionally been in the peripheries of global history
Although the Latin American practitioners of the various strains of dependency theories focused nationally within regional and global economic systems and contexts in which they often sought to transform the world through the transformation of the Latin American region, I found it telling that others sought to adapt dependency theories to conform with neoliberal logic, whilst others took a more radical approach to analyse and advocate for the Third World
I also found it particularly interesting and revealing of the inherent tensions in dependency thought that Quijano, who had participated in the discussions among cepalinos that have rose to "Dependency and Development", rejected the use of the term "dependency" and "its jargon" as "a deus ex machina", as the endpoint rather than the beginning of the analysis in contrast to the emphasis on concrete historical situations that characterised Cardoso and Faletto's work