The book follows Captain Nathan Chambers, who has returned from a period in the US Army that involved the Mexican war, and various actions in Texas against criminals and Indians to take over the family estate in Virginia after his father has died, and he is accompanied by a small number of men who served under him. He has an inherent dislike of slavery, but has about a hundred slaves. He decides he will free them, but first he must educate them in the ways of the world, and he hopes some will remain as paid employees to keep the estate going. It is July, 1960, and a new party is emerging up North, with a fellow called Lincoln aiming at being President. The North is in favour of abolition, the South is anything but.
The book tries to illustrate the social conditions of the time, and most of this feels right, but of course I don't know. If you get old enough to find some of what happened in your youth starts to be thought of as "historical", you learn it tends to be interpreted in ways that would not have occurred to those then. In this respect, there is a tendency of the soldiers to be busy expressing their feelings in an empathetic way, more desirable now. I think not. The story also tends to proceed very slowly, as if the objective is to spin out the basic plot into more books. The net result is that there are a number of threads, but they do not really get resolved. For me, a book in a sequence should resolve something, but all the threads seem to be left dangling at the end. Having said that, the writing is good, the main characters are believable, although the character Evelyn, when she has to make a decision, makes a believable one, but the reason why she does I found unlikely. Caveat: I have seen someone else make a similar decision for very similar reasons, but not the specific one. The great point about this book, though, is it creates a believable atmosphere for the period, and that gets its grading.