Had a friend recommend this book and was able to read it in a day or two.
I'm having a hard time rating this.
I really appreciated Highfield's honesty and vulnerability, and even the fact that he writes with a bit of an edge (whether he wants that to come across or not). It gives the book a very specific voice and makes clear what he sees as essential, optional, and just plain frustrating about the American church. It was therefore enjoyable to read and speaks to the heart of any who have felt disenchanted with the American church.
However, Highfield's argument is pretty radical. He basically recommends blowing up what we're doing and starting over, re-emphasizing the essentials and leaving the bloat behind. But the problem is that when you call strongly for deconstruction, it requires some very thoughtful and serious next steps for reconstruction, which Highfield doesn't really provide. Additionally, he makes a few offhanded remarks on how we don't need property or paid staff and so forth, but, again, doesn't really explain how we get there (or even why such a drastic step is needed).
And while Highfield probably wouldn't say this in person, I feel like his book downplays the importance of ordained church leadership. People who went to seminary, are theologically trained, and needed in churches to cast an accurate theological vision and stay away from false teaching. Trusting that to an army of volunteers and lay people sounds nice, but isn't practical.
All that to say, I still enjoyed the book. It really made me think. I'd even recommend it to others just for the purpose of stirring good thought and discussion. I just wish the author would've gone further with a detailed plan for how we get there and how to leave behind the bloat.