Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Avalonian Quest

Rate this book
Libro usado en buenas condiciones, por su antiguedad podria contener señales normales de uso

288 pages, Paperback

Published January 1, 1984

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Geoffrey Ashe

99 books42 followers
Geoffrey Thomas Leslie Ashe is a British cultural historian, a writer of non-fiction books and novels.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (23%)
4 stars
3 (17%)
3 stars
9 (52%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (5%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Octavia Cade.
Author 100 books138 followers
October 10, 2016
A book of two halves. I've had it on my shelf for years, but have never got around to reading it before this. Honestly, I was put off. I visited Glastonbury some years ago and frankly it gave me the creeps; I was under the (mistaken) idea that this book was some sort of new age crystal-waffle. Don't know why, although that - and the massive prevalence of infants, their prams clogging the footpaths - was one of my main impressions of the town if not the tor, so it passed over unfairly to Ashe I think.

I was very interested to find the first half a solidly researched history of the place. Really it was quite fascinating, reading the author sift out fact from fiction in the historical record and trying to put together a social, cultural and religious timeline of the site. I'm also quite prepared to believe that there's some sort of formed maze on the tor itself; that seems a reasonable conclusion even if we don't know the details of why and what for. So far I was impressed.

Then the second half of the book, and that's where he lost me. I read the book because I was interested in the Glastonbury site itself and suddenly Ashe isn't talking about Glastonbury any more, it's all central Asian travel histories and Hopi mythology and it's just too far afield for me, the connections too tenuous. The scepticism he employed in the first half of the book, when dealing with Geoffrey of Monmouth and so on, seemed to disappear. (I, on the other hand, was at this point sceptical enough for the both of us.)

In summary: really interesting first half, unconvincing second.
Displaying 1 of 1 review