This 500+-page novel is good: the story line is mostly plausible and quite moving.
Unfortunately, for a reader like me, many of the weirdnesses (typos, recurrent misspellings, and odd references) disrupted my suspension of disbelief. Five examples:
* the surname of one of the main characters is "Wells," and she happens to attend "Wellsberry School;"
* the word "diametric" ("diametrically," actually) appears only twice in the entire novel, just a couple of pages away from each other;
* "aisle" is spelled as "isle" (also used only twice in the novel, but this time in two consecutive paragraphs!);
* every time the "supposed to" or "used to" syntactical construction (I don't know what tense it is) appears, it appears as "suppose to" or "use to," as in "I am suppose to go to the store" or "I use to go to the store."
* Deborah is considered and called one of the "Matriarchs" of Judaism; while Deborah *is* a significant woman in the bible and in Jewish lore, I have never heard her referred to as a "Matriarch," with the label of "Matriarch" reserved for Sara, Rebecca, Rachel, and Leah. (I could be wrong about this issue; perhaps others do consider Deborah [who is referred to elsewhere as "Devora" in the novel, I might add:]a "Matriarch."
I know these issues might seem petty or small, but the inconsistencies and typos are signs of poor editing, in my opinion, which is a sign--to me--of the shoddiness of the publishing company and possibly the writer's research skills. Other readers may think I should have or could have overlooked these issues, but they jarred my reading experience, which annoys me.
I also know that reviews of these kinds of issues opens up the reviewer to similar criticisms, but a. I'm not being paid to write this review; b. I don't have an editor who was presumably paid to edit this review; and c. such is life: weirdnesses in writing usually hurt the writer's ethos and thus the writing's potency.
I will say, though, that I cried a few times and was enfuriated several, both indicative of the writer's ability to grab her (this) reader emotionally.
I would recommend this book to people who know something (enough to keep up with it) but who don't have extensive knowledge (too much to make the reading unenjoyable) about Judaism, the Holocaust, Russian political history, Israeli political history, and American industrial growth.