Рональд Рейган був одним із наймогутніших і найпопулярніших американських президентів. Щоб зрозуміти повною мірою пізнішого, політичного, Рейгана, чий харизматичний стиль і стриманість у здійсненні владних повноважень забезпечили йому повагу практично всіх представників найрізноманітніших політичних переконань на міжнародному рівні, необхідно познайомитися з більш раннім Рональдом Рейганом, голлівудським актором, який невтомно боровся за визнання, успіх і, врешті, за популярність. Утім, майже всі біографи Рейгана не заглиблювалися в роки, коли він був кінозіркою, активістом профспілкового руху і галантним ловеласом. Цю лакуну взявся заповнити відомий кінокритик та історик Марк Еліот. Спираючись на оригінальні дослідження, неопубліковані інтерв’ю, документи й матеріали, він намалював найправдивіший і найдокладніший портрет цієї людини. Еліот простежує початок і розвиток акторського шляху Рейгана, описує його холостяцькі дні, два його шлюби, згадує суперечливі вісім років перебування на посаді президента Гільдії акторів кіно, по-новому розкриває роботу Рейгана в кіно та на телебаченні пліч-о-пліч із видатними постатями Голлівуду того часу.
Рональду Рейгану вдалося не тільки вціліти за час своїх років у Голлівуді – у кінці цього періоду він зміг здійснити приголомшливу метаморфозу від провідного кіноактора – до державного діяча, від виконавця другорядних ролей у знімальних павільйонах – до людини, чия найбільша роль була зіграна на найвеличнішій сцені світу. Голлівуд допоміг створити публічний образ людини, яка згодом стане на чолі вільного світу, тож саме в Голлівуді варто шукати ключ до розуміння Рейгана: ким він був до того, ким врешті став.
На тлі розкішної, а подеколи й доволі жорстокої історії знаменитої Золотої доби Голлівуду біографія, яка вийшла з-під пера Еліота, розкриває походження людини-легенди Рональда Рейгана.
Another borrow from the library's Libby app. As someone whose first Presidential election memories are from 1980, Reagan has loomed large over my memories of my formative years. He was in office from the ages of 8 - 16 for me, and I remember an overall feeling of great pride to be an American at that time. I'm always curious about the BEFORE of a well-known person's life, especially their family life. This book is worth it if only to find out more about Reagan's first marriage to actor, Jane Wyman. I found it curious that I could watch Falcon Crest and see interviews with Wyman while Reagan was in office, but apparently the subject of their marriage was off-limits.
This book is also a good look at how Reagan made the move from SAG union president to a more conservative, Republican life. How Hollywood changed throughout the years is part of Reagan's story. I don't see why people are complaining about an author putting Reagan's actions into the context of the times. This book was far more illuminating than many of Reagan's biographies, which only focus on his presidency or gloss over his Hollywood years.
One can't help but appreciate all the details that Marc Eliot put into this book. Yes, it does feel like it gets sidetracked quite a bit, but as a "B-actor" (of which Reagan was assigned to in the 1940s), it's important to understand the circumstances surrounding him. Not to mention, he would become the most influential, popular and powerful figure of the entire group by the time the 1980s rolls around, but the book stops just short of the California gubernatorial race. Although predominantly a biography, "Reagan: The Hollywood Years" is a history of Hollywood during the World War II years and the blacklist of the 1950s. It's definitely a book referencing beyond just Reagan, but it's a confusing subject nonetheless.
A little disappointing. There were some good parts, lot's of just blah and quite a few boring parts in telling his life during his acting years. When he went on and on about some of the names in movies or who were up for parts I had to fast forward it. This was published in 2008 and well no offense, not a lot of people are going to truly know some of those names. So it seemed a little unnecessary to have it in multiple areas. Another thing he should have done when talking about how much things cost back then, how much is contract was or how much he made on this or that film was to translate that to todays dollar. I could not relate to it. The way he ended it was good though.
The biggest problem I had was the actual audio recording itself. It was poorly done and it sounded like he was too close to the microphone sometimes where it was echoing or something. It was just of poor sound quality.
This book seemed to relate very little information about his actual Hollywood career, such as it was. It spent much more time discussing his love of politics, even while in Hollywood, and his first wife's great dislike of his oratorical skills on that level.
Personally, I enjoyed the book - with or without the Hollywood emphasis. It was a wonderful glimpse into the early life of one of our Presidents. If his Hollywood career had been more successful, he might never have realized his true calling as President. It also provided a revealing look at the transition from film to television in the 1950s and the resulting struggle between the actors and the studios. Another great story in itself.
This book is about Ronald Reagan before his presidency and the struggles he went through as a actor and includes some information about his time during the election and presidency. The book mainly focuses on Reagan early love live and how he rose to the position of presidency. The book does a good job of separating the time periods into chapters of Reagan life. I personally did not find this book very intriguing, but for someone who is interested in politics and reading this is the book 4 u.
The most interesting parts of the book were those that dealt with Reagan's beginning in Hollywood, his time as president of the Screen Actor's Guild and his time in television.
Eliot really has no ability or seemingly interest in evaluating or even describing Reagan's films.
This book had it's highs and lows. Some parts were drawn out and beaten to a pulp, like the union woes and reagan being subpoenaed. It's half about Reagan's Hollywood years and half about the history of the movie industry.