Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Sacred Ground: Americans and Their Battlefields

Rate this book
      Americans have persistently expressed fascination with the nation's most
        famous battlefields through patriotic rhetoric, monument building, physical
        preservation, and battle reenactment. But each site is also a place where
        different groups of Americans come to compete for ownership of cherished
        national stories and to argue about the meaning of war, the importance
        of martial sacrifice, and the significance of preserving the nation's
        patriotic landscape.
      From the anniversary speeches at Lexington and Concord that shaped the
        image of the minuteman to Alamo Day speeches invoking the Texas "freedom
        fighters" of 1836 in support of the contras in Nicaragua; from passionate
        arguments over the placement of Confederate monuments at Gettysburg to
        confrontations between militant American Indian Movement and "Custer
        loyalists" during the Little Bighorn centennial in 1976; from the
        treatment of the USS Arizona at Pearl Harbor to continuing attempts
        to maintain the purity of these places in the face of commercialization--- Sacred
        Ground details the ongoing struggles to define, control, and subvert
        patriotic faith as expressed at these ceremonial sites.
     
 

352 pages, Paperback

First published October 1, 1991

52 people want to read

About the author

Edward Tabor Linenthal

13 books3 followers
Edward Linenthal is a Professor of History and Religious Studies at Indiana University: Bloomington.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
7 (19%)
4 stars
16 (44%)
3 stars
10 (27%)
2 stars
3 (8%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Ashley.
501 reviews19 followers
February 6, 2013
Linenthal's text suggests the multiple ways that Americans understand and experience battlefields. He emphasizes the quasi-religious language used around these spaces and extends this analogy into an argument about patriotic "orthodoxy" and "heresy." It's a useful, if somewhat simplistic, argument.

The book is organized around several case-studies and offers a solid overview of the controversies that swirl around American battlefield parks. The study of the American Indian Movement (AIM) activities at the Custer/Little Big Horn National Battlefield Park is particularly interesting and offers the most in-depth analysis of the racial and cultural dynamics to navigate on battlefields.

Unfortunately, it's now a dated text because after 9/11 and the bombing in Oklahoma City the concept of a "battlefield" is deeply problematic. The arguments he makes about patriotic orthodoxy feel shallow post-Patriot Act. Had this book provided a more theoretical take on battlefields it would probably still be relevant. Instead, by recapping controversies, it feels like a snapshot of a how Americans used/responded to battlefields at a particular period of time in the late 1980s.
Profile Image for Tracy.
403 reviews8 followers
January 14, 2011
What an interesting book! I had never thought about the emphasis placed by Americans on battlefields. Oddly enough as a history student I have never visited a battlefield...and this was definitely an eye opening experience and brought up some very interesting issues about history and how it is presented. What do you think? Do you think history should give you the whole picture, or just tell you who won and glorify that?
35 reviews1 follower
April 12, 2007
Hmmm...another public history book. We'll see...

AND, it's read. I really liked it actually. It's redundant, but he's a thoughtful author that really makes his readers question their interactions with battle grounds in particular, and historic sites in general. One of my favorite Public History texts this year.
Profile Image for Thomas Mackie.
196 reviews4 followers
July 29, 2011
This starts great discussions on the false ideas coming from heritage celebrations and opposed to history. Many historic site's supporters want comfort for an already established agenda.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.