I have followed Aparna Verma on Tiktok for a while, and so was excited to read the ARC of The Boy With Fire. Though I read it just before release, I have held off on reviewing for a while in order to adequately collect my thoughts. I also didn't want my mixed review to cloud the excitement of release week.
I think the story of The Boy with Fire has potential. Aparna is a good writer, and her prose was gripping. To me, however, the book had several key flaws - including the way that it was marketed - that let me down.
The initial pitch of The Boy With Fire was "Dune meets The Poppy War". This has been pushed heavily by the publishers, to the point of it being the first line in the Goodreads summary. Additional marketing points: Adult SFF, morally grey characters, and political intrigue. Unfortunately, though I think the book had its positives, it did not deliver on what it had promised.
I see the superficial similarities to both Dune and the Poppy War - one of the most interesting aspects of the story was the blending of fantasy and sci-fi. However, the hallmark of these books is that they are sweeping, complex, adult political fantasies. Aside from the surface level, I do not see those hallmarks in The Boy With Fire.
Honestly, I think that for me TBWF was trying to pack too much into one book. The emphasis on religion was well-drawn, yes. But that left little space for the expansive politics, the worldbuilding, the characterization, which all suffered. It felt both rushed and bloated; though SFF often has a slower initial pace, very little actually happened in the first 70% of the story.
I can excuse slow pace if I see very carefully constructed characterization, intricate politics, or even thoughtful worldbuilding. TBWF laid the groundwork for all of these things, but many of them ended up falling flat.
I’m going to summarise my main thoughts here.
1) Religion
For me, TBWF’s greatest strength was the focus on religion. I very much had to squint to see the references to Hindu mythology, but the religion woven into the narrative was uniquely done. The inclusion of prophecies in fantasy is very much a hit or miss for me; but The Boy With Fire very much managed to include prophecy in a way that still allowed for the characters their free will and their own roles in the plot. That’s unusual for a fantasy, and I did enjoy it. The book also includes a fascinating twist on the Chosen One trope, and I’m excited to see how that plays out.
2) Characterization.
I would honestly say that Leo had the strongest characterization out of the POV characters. His goals were clearly fleshed out, and the onset of his madness, though sudden, was believable. The reasons behind what he was doing made logical sense, though the actions themselves were morally reprehensible.
Elena and Yassen however, were not given that courtesy. By the end of the novel, Elena was supposed to have experienced a moral decline; unfortunately, her initial motivations and characterisation were so unclear that it felt ingenuine, the reasoning behind her decisions flimsy at best. Elena felt, very fundamentally, like a Young Adult heroine. Her existing personality traits would have been compelling on a 16 year old, but on an adult woman naivete, daddy issues and a coming of age story arc feel almost incongruous. There’s nothing wrong with YA literature - some of my favourite books are YA fantasy - but TBWF was marketed as an adult SFF. It did not feel like one.
Yassen is a character who logically should have had a degree of moral complexity. There’s the very classic conflict in the trope of the reluctant assassin, which is always effective; the plot twist regarding Yassen’s allegiances gives it a unique flair. I do think, however, that this reveal would have been more effective had we not actually had his point of view in the novel at all. Since we did get to see his thought process throughout, it genuinely did not make sense that he has been keeping such a big secret from the audience. He’s not denying it to himself; so why doesn’t it appear in his inner monologue at all? This omission obscured key aspects of Yassen’s personality, making him feel generic as a character throughout the story and making it very difficult to feel invested in him.
The romance between Elena and Yassen also felt lackluster to me. Their romance was so slow burn that it felt nonexistent. There were practically no hints that they cared for one another by the end of the book, and their bonding moments felt almost shoehorned in. I could understand if the author wanted to develop a relationship between the characters, but I think it would have been a better fit for a sequel.
Personally, I would say that the biggest weaknesses of The Boy With Fire came with its characterisation. The characters were distinctly archetypal; other than Samson at the very end, they did not feel as though they evolved past those archetypes. It’s easy to forgive a novel’s flaws if the characters are compelling enough. Unfortunately, since I was not invested in the characters of The Boy With Fire, I found it difficult to enjoy the rest of the story.
3) Politics
The Boy With Fire packed in several different political threads. The most significant ones were domestic unrest in Ravence, tense international relations, and the increasingly fraught relationship between a monarch and his religious leaders. On paper, this should lend itself to a fascinating and rich and complex tapestry of worldbuilding.
This does not come through clearly in the novel. The bare bones are very much there, and it is absolutely possible for it to be fleshed out further in future novels. I don’t think that the novel spent the time to weave this tapestry effectively, making it hard to adequately feel the political strain that the country is under. The undercurrents were there, but at the end of the day there was simply too much going on.
Ultimately, The Boy With Fire has potential. Aparna Verma is a good writer, but I don’t think that this book was for me. I will still be buying the sequels when they release, and am continuing to support her works as I wish her every success in the future.