I'm back. OCD has a tight grip on my reading choices. I try to remind myself that I "only" have fifteen IJ books left to read, if that. (It's complicated, and no way in hell am I going to explain everything.)
If you read a lot of my reviews, you know, for the most part, why I hate Johansen's writing, but to sum it up: she uses the same phrases over and over again; her women are all the same; her men are all the same; a lot of the sex is bordering on rape; everyone talks with the exact same dialect, even though her characters are spread out all across the country, and indeed, the planet; she doesn't know how to write children realistically; and every character is ludicrously "gifted" in some way, to the extent that you're left wondering if there are any average people in IJ's world. The more of them I read, the more reasons I find to dislike them.
That's not to say IJ is completely talentless. She is actually quite good at building tension, and occasionally, there will be a line that makes me chuckle. And I can't write off (hee) someone who's written multiple bestsellers. She seems to genuinely enjoy writing.
That said, I'm not going to lie and say I adore her books or think they're well-written. I don't. That's my opinion, and I'm not going to try to change anyone's mind. But I needed to vent somewhere.
"Pandora's Daughter" appears to be one of IJ's better known books, at least outside her Eve Duncan series. It tells the story of a woman, Megan Blair, who grew up hearing "voices," which her late mother told her was just a phase. However, it turns out that her mother had psychic powers, which she has, unfortunately, passed down to her daughter. Both Megan and her mother are Listeners, which means that, when in a location where something bad happened, they can hear the voices of those who were involved in those tragedies. They may also be "Pandoras"--people who can awaken others' latent psychic abilities. Unfortunately, this gift is often a curse rather than a blessing, as ordinary people usually can't handle such powers, and commit suicide.
Enter Neal Grady, a "Controller"--someone who can greatly influence people to do something or feel a certain way--who promised to Megan's mother to do everything in his power to suppress Megan's "gift," which Neal does by essentially "brainwashing" Megan into believing that her mother died under circumstances unrelated to psychic powers, or even that such powers exist. Now, however, he's going to need Megan's help in order to find and kill the big bad of the story, so he's willing to return her "gift" to her. He outright says that he's using her for his own ends, but that's pretty typical of IJ's men.
But we get something... "special" in Neal Grady. Now, IJ loves her December-May romances. But in this case, she goes one step further. Neal, who is 10 years older than Megan, admits not just to himself (and the reader), but to her that he's wanted her sexually ever since she was fifteen. The fact that she mentions that she was "mature for her age" at that time makes this more creepy, not less, because that's exactly what pedophiles say to justify "dating" children. Johansen, a fifteen-year-old isn't even legal in any state in the U.S. And no, I'm not going to give Neal a medal for waiting until Megan was in her late twenties to screw her, especially when he tells her, "I had to keep telling myself that you were no Lolita and I'd be sorry as hell if I seduced you."
Now, this is the same author who thinks Bathsheba was a "bimbo" who took baths on rooftops (the Bible says nothing about her bathing on a rooftop; DAVID was on a rooftop, so he could have easily seen her bathing), but she has sorely misinterpreted "Lolita." Dolores didn't ENJOY being raped by Humbert. I guess he's saying that, unlike Dolores, Megan wasn't trying to seduce him? So if she was, it would have been okay? Never mind that Lolita's behavior can hardly be called "seduction" when she barely knows what she's doing? Lolita was a VICTIM, Neal.
But it doesn't matter, because even though Neal waits until Megan is legal to initiate sexy times, he has no more respect for her boundaries than any other male in IJ's books. When she puts up a feeble resistance, he refuses to take no for an answer because he knows she wants it. At one point, he tells her he'll leave her alone, then immediately changes his mind and begins to fondle her throat. I'm not kidding.
Ladies, if you want this kind of dynamic with a man, find someone who's into BDSM and will discuss your boundaries and limits, and you can do a little roleplay. Don't date anyone who treats you this way for real. Especially if he can control your mind and is constantly reminding you that he's choosing not to do it, but he could do it if he wanted to, and he really wants to because he's a selfish SOB. Take him at his word and dump him.
There's another character, Renata Wilger, who's thrown into the novel about halfway through. Like Megan, she had the potential to be interesting, but she's just another Strong Female Character that IJ seems to like so much. It's laughable that IJ attempts to portray her as being different from Megan, because they're exactly the same. Oh, Renata may be a little crabbier, and a little more willing to use people, but both women are stubborn and refuse to take help from anyone, because God forbid you actually behave like a normal human being. At one point, Megan tells Renata she needs to grow up and accept that Megan is going to pity her. Ha! Can you imagine ANY of IJ's heroines taking pity any better than Renata does? But I guess it's okay because Megan's older...or something.
Another annoying thing that Megan does is insist that Neal throw everything he can at her so she can "master" her power and not "be a cripple." This book was published in 2007. Can we say "insensitive"? Although this isn't IJ's first flirt with ableism. In general, people with disabilities are either "special" or objects of pity in IJ's books. She does lean more toward the "special" side, especially with mental disorders and intellectual disabilities. In fact, most of her heroines would qualify for depression or PTSD, but there's often the faint implication that only weak people "let" their disabilities take over their lives, as if all you need is a positive attitude and everything will work out. She also throws around "insanity" and "madness" to refer to evil or unfortunate people (but of course, her heroines are never "crazy").
Her villains are nothing special. The big bad had a son whom he loved, but again, it's not enough to make him interesting. Just like the bad guy in the Taking/Hunting/Silencing Eve trilogy that was published a decade later, he has "conversations" with his dead son. His evilness was so over the top that I practically groaned aloud whenever the narrative switched to him. Honestly, you could line all of IJ's villains side by side, and I couldn't tell you who was who or what book they were from; they're all that identical. And of COURSE he's a pedophile, too. Look, I know pedophiles exist, but this schtick has gotten so predictable. Give it a rest. Trust me, Iris Jo, your villains are horrible enough.
The concept of the Ledger wasn't terribly interesting to me, but I was interested in the individuals from the Devanez family and their psychic gifts. None of the "gifts" that were elaborated upon in this book were terribly interesting to me. "Finders" are like bloodhounds--they can find someone as long as they have an object that belonged to them. I guess I'm supposed to find it interesting because it's paranormal, but I prefer things like talking to animals, predicting the future, even mind control. See, psychic abilities in fiction are supposed to be relatable to the rest of us. They're supposed to ask and maybe answer questions about humanity and philosophy and ethics. Like, is controlling someone's thoughts ever morally justified? If you can hear the thoughts of animals, what does that say about sentience? About the use of animals for food and clothing products? Does the existence of a readable future--even a highly unlikely one--cancel out free will?
Instead, we get psychic powers that only exist to cause drama. Sure, Megan's abilities have a few practical uses, but mostly they just cause her a lot of pain.
And yet...I don't know what exactly, but there was something about "Pandora's Daughter" that made it stand out a bit among her other novels. Maybe it's because it didn't try to hide the fact that it was a paranormal novel. Maybe it's because I didn't have to deal with Eve Duncan or her insufferable daughter, Jane. Maybe it's that I'd heard of the book before and knew about positive reviews for it. Maybe it was the sex scenes, of which there were more than usual (and which I enjoy when I can ignore the fact that the male is a POS).
In any case, it's rare for me to give an IJ novel more than two stars, but there you go. I actually...kind of liked it. I just wish I could put my finger on why.