In the selected readings by H.G. Wells, the stories show very compellingly what happens when a person tinkers with science, visibility, control, biology and religion. These stories are powerful and frightening at times and challenge our notions about humanity, ethics and social structure. “The Star”, however, is distinctly different in that it shows how powerless mankind is in reality to the might of the universe. It shows what nature can do to us and not how mankind can control nature.
Wells wants to contrast the immensity and size of the universe to the inconsequential incidentals with which mankind concerns itself. The narrator expounds that “few people without a training in science can realize the huge isolation of the solar system.”
The seriousness of the new star is noticed at first only by scientists, while the average person failed to care past their own little world to give much notice to the event taking place. “’What is a new star to me?’ cried the weeping woman, kneeling beside her dead”, while “pretty women, flushed and glittering, heard the news told jestingly between the dances, and feigned an intelligent interest they did not feel.” As the star grew nearer, people continued to be nonplussed, and “save for the talk of idle moments and the splendor of the night, nine human beings out of ten were still busy at their common occupations.” Wells is suggesting that humans are merely interested in what directly affects their own lives: “Do we come in the way? I wonder —” asks the school boy.
The devastation sustained by the star was inevitable, and there was nothing, not even the learned scientists, could do to stop it. Prayer was futile. The havoc and destruction changed the earth irreversibly.
Compared to the other Wells selections, “The Star” shows the overwhelming domination of nature and the pettiness of mankind in comparison. As the master mathematician says, “Man has lived in vain.”