Entre los siglos XV y XVIII se produjo en Europa una revolución de los rituales culturales y religioso que transformaron notablemente todos los conceptos esenciales de los comportamientos humanos, fundamentalmente los referidos al tiempo (ciclos litúrgicos, la semana, el día, la hora...), al cuerpo (carnaval, ritos de violencia, rituales de la mesa, cortejo...) y la presencia de las fuerzas espirituales en el mundo.
En esta obra, el autor hace un estudio ameno y riguroso sobre dichos cambios y su permanencia en nuestra sociedad actual. También reflexiona sobre el amplio abanico de argumentos donde incluye las Reformas protestante y católica y los supuestos ritos anticristianos de brujas y judíos.
Edward Muir’s Ritual in Early Modern Europe describes the Reformation as a process of distanciation from the material world, relocating the locus of the sacred from the materially accessible to the inwardly apprehensible. With a shift in focus from real presence to represented presence, and from direct encounter to description (the exposition of truth), ritual became more a matter of cognitive apprehension than visceral experience. Reformers seeking clarity and certainty “replaced the mass with the sermon” (184) and tended to intellectualize faith. The core ritual question correspondingly shifted from “what emotions does it evoke?” to “what does it mean?” (158)
The strength of Muir’s argument is its clarity, and while Muir gravitates towards the sensational, lurid and macabre, his vignettes give a rich texture to his argument. I do wonder, however, whether these extreme stories give an accurate description of what late medieval life was actually like. Nevertheless, Muir avoids what Charles Taylor called “the subtraction story”: a relatively straight line from the numinous medieval world to the disenchanted world of modernity via the Protestant Reformation. Instead, he attempts to show how the Protestant relationship with ritual was not so much a matter of loss as of transformation.
Re-read January 7, 2010: very textbook-y. I think it was at this point that I began to understand just how very right my peers were when they told me that at some point in my reading, I would begin to be able to tell what the book was going to say before I'd even read it. Admittedly, I'd already read it, but still.
Basically: early modern life organized around ritual; the Reformation reconfigured ritual life in Protestant areas and the Council of Trent placed ritual in Catholic areas more squarely under control of the church; and the Enlightenment changed everything. Obviously.
An excellently defended proposal - that the Reformation was not an argument about doctrine but an argument about the place, nature, and meaning of ritual. Thoroughly researched and easy to read, Muir makes his case while providing many intriguing questions for further study. Though I took issue with a few of his conclusions, I think Muir does a great job of defending his ideas and giving me plenty to think about as I continue my own research.
This is one of the most interesting books I've ever read. The history presented is good, but what really takes the cake are Muir's ideas on ritual, and how well his assertions fit into both history and modern life. In fact, I often applied this book to literary studies and criticism ... it earned me several high grades and a few awards.