I can only give three stars to this book mainly because I disagree with what Rudd elaborated in Chapters 16 and 17.
Kevin Rudd, 陸克文, Is a former Australian diplomat and Prime Minister. He graduated from Australian National University with honours in Chinese language and Chinese history. He spent a couple of years in Taipei to continue his Chinese studies. In his early diplomatic career, he was appointed Second Secretary at the Australian Embassy in Beijing and promoted to First Secretary later.
From 1998 to 2013, he started his political career as a federal Member of Parliament. He assumed the shadow minister, the opposition leader, the Australian Prime Minister, and Foreign Minister. His academic, professional experiences and fluent Mandarin have undoubtfully earned him one of the most knowledgeable political analysts and commentators in China trade, diplomacy, and geopolitics among western politicians.
Rudd began the book with a brief history of the US-China relationship. He then methodically detailed Xi Jinping’s worldview with ten concentric circles of interest, starting from the most important regarding Xi’s position in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to other domestic political priorities and his international aspirations for the country. He analysed various factors, motives, and desires influencing Xi and the impacts on world affairs from his worldview. The list of Xi’s worldviews was Rudd’s conclusions from all his conversations with many Chinese interlocutors and other sources over many years.
The book also presented various scenarios of how the US or China prevailed or ended in stalemate on different battlefields of conflict. In each scenario, Rudd projected the consequences it could have on the US, China, and the rest of the world. Finally, Rudd laid out possible solutions to navigate the uncertain future and avoid the war through what he called “managed strategic competition”.
However, this can’t be an excellent book for a reader like me with a profound legacy with the island where the possible war to be avoided between the US and China. It is my home country, an island 145-177 kilometres from China.
I have been a Taiwanese-Australian for half of my life. My former employer, one of the leading American multinational corporations, assigned me to Beijing as an expatriate to live and work with China’s top State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) for several years. After the assignment, I continued to work with these SOEs for another decade.
Even though Rudd is one of the very few politicians with deep insights into CCP, he still made similar mistakes in this book that most western politicians would have frequently committed. In my viewpoint, he could not believe what CCP said to him.
When Rudd finished the book, the following events had not happened.
• 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
No one would foresee that the world's unquestioned second most potent military power would not win the war quickly enough. Instead, Russia could lose the war after seven months of battle.
China has learned and followed Russia in building its military power and has not been involved in major military conflicts in recent decades. Do Rudd and his think tank believe China has the military prowess to fight the US and its allies?
If Russia can’t win this war, China will become the major public enemy of the liberal democratic alliance.
• Economic Sanctions against Russia
If China invades Taiwan, sanctions may be imposed on China, as is the case with Russia, that invaded Ukraine. Neutral Switzerland would adopt EU sanctions to quickly identify and freeze corrupted Chinese assets.
Over 90% of the world’s most advanced semiconductors are manufactured in Taiwan. It is possible that Taiwan and its allies could destroy state-of-the-art semiconductor fabrication plants. The destruction of critical plants and the interruption of shipments would bring about a global economic calamity.
• Shinzo Abe’s assassination on July 8
Before Japan’s former PM Shinzo Abe was assassinated, he said several times, “A Taiwan contingency is a Japanese contingency, and therefore a contingency for the Japan-U.S. alliance….” He reflected that Japan and Taiwan must work together to protect freedom and democracy.
His assassination can likely urge Japan to increase its military spending and take a more proactive strategy against China. However, if the US unleashes Japan to step up its defence, this switch can become China’s nightmare.
• China’s economy – zero-COVID policy and collapsing housing market
According to reports from multiple resources, China’s economy is in serious trouble. If China can only maintain a 3-4% or lower GDP growth in the foreseeable future, CCP won’t sustain a considerable military and public security budget of around $450 billion annually.
After the Chinese civil war ended in 1949, CCP gained control of mainland China and established the People’s Republic of China, forcing the Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-Shek of the Republic of China to retreat to Taiwan.
In my generation of education, we were taught Chinese history; we were told we were Chinese. After Taiwan transformed into a liberal-democratic nation in the late 1990s, much fewer Taiwanese alleged they were Chinese because they didn’t want to be associated with a party ruled by either crooks or thugs. Most Taiwanese recognise that CCP is a thuggish regime. There is no love or fantasy for the Taiwanese on a reunion with China, only more hatred and hostility.
Independence movements have swept around the world since World War II ended. More than 100 countries have become independent or have transformed into new nations. Hence, many people wonder why CCP has been sticking to a prehistoric imperial mentality and claiming Taiwan must return to its motherland.
For more than seventy-three years, if CCP could seize Taiwan with military forces, they would have done so. Nevertheless, they could not achieve this. Therefore, they have been bullying people living in Taiwan even though they have not ruled the island one single day. They declared they would resort to a full-scale war to take over the renegade province. In most Taiwanese views, those who claim national rejuvenation and embrace nationalism would serve best the emperor Xi Jinping and provide the legitimacy of CCP ruling.
Scenario 3 Chapter 16 mentions that the Taiwanese army is generally considered undertrained and under-armed. However, international developments are turning in Taiwan’s favour. The US is selling the weapons to Taiwan to defend against an asymmetric war. In wartime, Taiwan could mobilise a counter-invasion force of at least 450,000 troops and probably far more.
If CCP plans to take over Taiwan in 2026/2027, Japan would likely come to Taiwan’s defence, and Japan’s involvement would draw the US into that conflict. According to the latest report, Japan is considering the deployment of 1,000 long-range cruise missiles to boost its counterattack capability against China. The missiles would be existing arms modified to extend their range from 100 km to 1,000 km.
Many analysts say an invasion of Taiwan would be more dangerous and complex than the Allied D-Day landings in France in World War II. The military experts project that 3000-4000 short and middle ranges of missiles targeting China will be deployed across the coasts of Japan and Taiwan. The vessels carrying People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops and equipment would be like sitting ducks crossing Taiwan Strait. China’s invading Taiwan will become a massacre for the Chinese navy.
Hence, in my view, the most likely scenario in chapter 16 of this book will be like
Scenario 5: Washington, Tokyo and Taipei Together Succeed in Deterring Beijing from the Use of Force Against Taiwan – Washington’s Best-Case Scenario.
Most of my Chinese friends, who are not CCP members, always said we could tell what CCP would do. They would only perform the opposite of what they said. The former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that when dealing with CCP, we must distrust and verify their words. Rudd talked highly about CCP in this book and spent 90% of the focus on CCP and Xi Jinping. Was this book written for American readers, or he thought the world was moving in Xi’s favour?
For this reason, if the liberal-democratic world has to distrust and verifies what CCP said, what can the US achieve from engaging in Managed Strategic Competitions with CCP? They will not be fair competition in any strategic competition. Thus, the only strategies that the US can proceed with should cover the following hardline measures.
• Continue to rebuild US military and economic capacity at home and reconsolidate America’s alliance abroad after Trump’s trauma.
• Step up Washington’s efforts to blatantly contain China from advancing in artificial intelligence, semiconductor, biotech, and other technologies.
• Sanction Chinese technology entities linked to CCP’s military organisations.
• Bar imports from Xinjiang over human rights abuse of Uyghurs.
• Decouple with China as much as the US can.
• Move the US manufacturing factories out of China.
The US allies should follow the above actions. Australia should diversify iron ore sales to other countries as much as it can and restrict its export to China. This can mitigate China from building more killing vessels.
Indeed, the US can continue to work with China on issues like supply chain, global financial stability, and climate change. Nevertheless, can we trust that China will become a greenhouse gas emission-zero nation by 2060?
Rudd talked too much in the last chapter of the book. This war could be a bloody World War III. On the other hand, an unwavering approach might be the best and the only option to deal with CCP.