Abortion Ethics in a Nutshell: A Pro-Both Tour of the Moral Arguments

by Matt Deaton

**Full audiobook version now available for free on YouTube** In the wake of the Dobbs decision, America needs a calm rethinking of abortion. And as most of us intuitively sense, it's too complicated for one favored "right" to override all other concerns. Rather, we need to balance the interests of the mother, the value of the potential person growing within her, the resulting child's expected quality of life, the father's autonomy, and even the impact on extended family and possibly society at large.Politicians and talking heads would have us believe abortion is either about respecting women or human life, that we're either on Team Red or Team Blue with no room for thoughtful dissent. However, the inadequacy of the traditional pro vs. pro paradigm becomes apparent via a simple yet illuminating exercise borrowed from professors at the University of "Rate That Abortion," the focus of chapter 4. That section alone confirms the hidden complexity of abortion ethics. The rest of the book employs the work of dozens of philosophers (translated into everyday language) to re-map the moral landscape and guide a new understanding.One bit of long-term artificial wombs will one day facilitate choice and life, enabling what could be the ultimate win-win. As ethicists Peter Singer and Deanne Wells put it, "Abortions would in effect become early births," enabling sworn enemies from the decades-long abortion wars to "embrace in happy harmony."

But would such a medical miracle cause more problems than it eases? Find out. Enrich your own view with the power of some of the best arguments moral thinkers have had to offer. And help elevate the discussion at a time when we need it most.

172 pages, Kindle Edition

Published February 20, 2021

About the author

I write for readers like myself -- people with a sense of humor who love learning and never turn down encouragement. My goal: enlighten, inspire, and entertain.

Reviews

[Chris Boutté · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is a phenomenal book that really dives into the nuances of the abortion debate. Matt Deaton is a philosopher who has spent a lot of time thinking deeply about the topic of abortion. I’ve been pro-choice my entire life, but Deaton addresses topics I hadn’t even considered. While it didn’t change my opinion at all, it sure gave me a lot to think about, and I think it’s a great read for anyone interested in the topic.

[Бранко · Rating 3 out of 5]

I watched this author on YouTube explaining Sandel’s philosophical book “Justice” and was very pleased by his explanation, understanding of the book and engaging presentation. So, I was looking forward to read a book that he wrote.
Unfortunately,I was disappointed. The book is clearly written for American audience since it is tiptoeing through the minefield of American tribalism.
Therefore, the book is very cautious, reluctant to enter any deeper issue (or any issue deep enough), is very simplistic, and (rarely) almost childlike. It is a short book but even for this length it is too superficial. Even basic definitions (personhood, autonomy) are insufficient.
So, why should you read it?
Well, firstly, you don’t have to since the author has posted free audiobook version on YouTube. Since he is reading it is more engaging and I wish I used that format . And it’s free in case you don’t like it.
Also, the author occasionally explains an argument very well, thoroughly, from several perspectives and giving examples that help you understand the issue. This is not frequent but is very useful when he does it.
The author tries hard to be impartial.
Furthermore, the author gives references. Although you will not gain much from this book you will know where to go further and visit more serious authors on this topic if you wish to expand your knowledge.
Finally,there some interesting medical issues. And, although they are single cases and therefore anecdotal, they are interesting and will make you think about abortion.

[Sarah · Rating 4 out of 5]

I disagree with the author, not because I have a problem with his logic, but because I don't accept one of his basic premises that he bases his logic on.

I'm still giving this four stars because it's evenhanded and logical, even if I don't agree with the author's conclusions.

If I have time, I'm going to write an essay in response to this.