What do you think?
Rate this book
New Cold War History
Cold War Liberation: The Soviet Union and the Collapse of the Portuguese Empire in Africa, 1961–1975
Cold War Liberation examines the African revolutionaries who led armed struggles in three Portuguese colonies—Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea-Bissau—and their liaisons in Moscow, Prague, East Berlin, and Sofia. By reconstructing a multidimensional story that focuses on both the impact of the Soviet Union on the end of the Portuguese Empire in Africa and the effect of the anticolonial struggles on the Soviet Union, Natalia Telepneva bridges the gap between the narratives of individual anticolonial movements and those of superpower rivalry in sub-Saharan Africa during the Cold War.
Drawing on newly available archival sources from Russia and Eastern Europe and interviews with key participants, Telepneva emphasizes the agency of African liberation leaders who enlisted the superpower into their movements via their relationships with middle-ranking members of the Soviet bureaucracy. These administrators had considerable scope to shape policies in the Portuguese colonies which in turn increased the Soviet commitment to decolonization in the wider region. An innovative reinterpretation of the relationships forged between African revolutionaries and the countries of the Warsaw Pact, Cold War Liberation is a bold addition to debates about policy-making in the Global South during the Cold War.
Drawing on newly available archival sources from Russia and Eastern Europe and interviews with key participants, Telepneva emphasizes the agency of African liberation leaders who enlisted the superpower into their movements via their relationships with middle-ranking members of the Soviet bureaucracy. These administrators had considerable scope to shape policies in the Portuguese colonies which in turn increased the Soviet commitment to decolonization in the wider region. An innovative reinterpretation of the relationships forged between African revolutionaries and the countries of the Warsaw Pact, Cold War Liberation is a bold addition to debates about policy-making in the Global South during the Cold War.
288 pages, Hardcover
First published June 6, 2022
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
June 26, 2026
An interesting history of the Soviet Union's decolonization efforts in Africa with Portugal's African possessions, Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea Bissau.
Whereas the other major European colonial powers such as Great Britain and France had, by the 1960s, realized trying to retain their African possessions was to be on the wrong side of history and would only come at the expense of their recovery efforts from World War 2, Portugal, under the Salazar Regime, would persist well into the 70s in fighting to retain her African colonies.
On the face of it, given her limited resources and small size, particularly given the difficulties much larger countries like the US and France had experienced in such places as Vietnam and Algeria, Portugal having any chance of holding onto her colonies --- collectively far larger in area than Vietnam --- would seem a fool's errand. Yet, somehow, Portugal managed for 14 years to punch above her weight, fighting off not one "Viet Cong" -- but effectively 3 in Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea Bissau.
How? For one thing, the various resistance groups (PAIGC in Guinea Bissau; FRELIMO in Mozambique, and MPLA, FNLA, and UNITAS in Angola) were plagued by low resources, tribal and racial rivalries, and competition between various internal and external factions. Portugal, in comparison, had unified command and control, applied proven counterinsurgency tactics, and used clandestine operations by its intelligence service, PIDE, ably to engage in sabotage and targeted assassinations --- as well as planting disinformation to amplify disunity within their adversaries.
Contrary to a view probably held by many in my generation during the Cold War -- that the Soviet Union was calculatingly exploiting wars in the Developing World to expand the Soviet Bloc under the thrall of communism --- "Cold War Liberation", taking advantage of newly released declassified files from the former Soviet Union -- reveals a far different picture of Soviet intentions and policy with Portugal's African colonies.
Under Khruschev, Soviet focus was more upon Europe and the US --- little thought given to addressing the restive Third World. However, with Kruschev's downfall in 1964, his successors under Brezhnev, sought to change this --- motivated by ideology, but also by a feeling that the USSR needed to do more to stand up to America and to ensure that it had access to military and economic resources in Africa. However, even so, contrary to the perceived policy of communist world domination, internally, Soviet Union policy in reality was more reactive than proactive in this regard. Allies like Czechoslovakia (in the early stages of the revolutions in the Portuguese colonies), and, later, Cuba seem more to have taken the initiative in aiding the resistance groups, urging the Soviet Union to get more involved. Also, China, by the late 60s, a rival for leadership of the communist world, began training and indoctrinating resistance leaders and fighters from the colonies. Fearing that China would be able to gain prestige in the developing world from this at the Soviet Union's expense, Soviet leaders only then began to increase their involvement in Portugal's colonies.
In addition, contrary to the perception of Soviet policy as being opaque and monolithic, Soviet African policy was more the net output of a rivalry between its Communist Party's International Bureau --- which sought to spread world revolution in Africa --- and other players such as in the Foreign Ministry, concerned about creating unnecessary and costly distractions with respect to improved relations with the West, and in the GRU and Soviet military, concerned about expenditure of their resources for these various resistance groups, with potentially little gain in return for them. In reality, especially in comparison with US effort in Vietnam, the Soviet military aid expenditure in the Portuguese colonies was fairly parsimonious --- not much than a few million dollars per year.
The book goes into detail on the various rivalries and maneuverings within the resistance groups as well as their efforts to court greater and greater Soviet support for their cause.
However, the seminal event that finally put an end to Portuguese efforts to hold onto their empire was a military revolt in Portugal --- the Carnation Revolution. After 14 years, Portugal's military had realized that further fighting in the African colonies was wasteful and futile --- and immediately they began negotiations with the respective resistance groups in each colony for an end to the fighting and for independence.
While, for the most part, Portugal's handoff of power to FRELIMO in Mozambique and to PAIGC in Guinea Bissau went fairly smoothly, not so in Angola. Angola's resistance, divided into 3 rival armed groups, made it difficult for the Portuguese even to coordinate to whom to give power. The result: a power vacuum. The Portuguese simply pulled out their forces, and free for all ensued between the MPLA, the FNLA, and UNITAS --- and, further adding to the chaos, other nations, Zaire, Cuba, and South Africa intervened, each in the effort to protect their interests. Seeing South Africa invade Angola from Namibia and occupy most of southwestern Angola practically unopposed moved the Soviet Union, formerly tight-fisted, to increase its involvement in Angola, sending massive airlifts and shipments of weapons to the MPLA.
That would result in the MPLA controlling the Angolan capitol, Luanda, and managing to fend off its two rivals, long enough to gain international recognition as the Government of Angola. While Angolan War for Independence had ended, now, Angola would descend into another 15 years of civil war --- only abating until the 1990s.
I thought it interesting how the Soviet policy in an area such as this was different from what I had perceived it to be during my youth when I lived during the Cold War --- as much the case with other nations making foreign and military policy decisions --- Soviet policy with respect to the Portuguese colonies and their liberation movements --- was an overall output of various factions within it, motivated variously by publicly stated ideals and ideology and by internal pragmatic concerns. I recommend this book for those interested in learning more about the internal workings of the former Soviet Union, for those interested in learning how the Cold War effected the Third World, and for those interested in learning about the decolonization of Africa.
Whereas the other major European colonial powers such as Great Britain and France had, by the 1960s, realized trying to retain their African possessions was to be on the wrong side of history and would only come at the expense of their recovery efforts from World War 2, Portugal, under the Salazar Regime, would persist well into the 70s in fighting to retain her African colonies.
On the face of it, given her limited resources and small size, particularly given the difficulties much larger countries like the US and France had experienced in such places as Vietnam and Algeria, Portugal having any chance of holding onto her colonies --- collectively far larger in area than Vietnam --- would seem a fool's errand. Yet, somehow, Portugal managed for 14 years to punch above her weight, fighting off not one "Viet Cong" -- but effectively 3 in Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea Bissau.
How? For one thing, the various resistance groups (PAIGC in Guinea Bissau; FRELIMO in Mozambique, and MPLA, FNLA, and UNITAS in Angola) were plagued by low resources, tribal and racial rivalries, and competition between various internal and external factions. Portugal, in comparison, had unified command and control, applied proven counterinsurgency tactics, and used clandestine operations by its intelligence service, PIDE, ably to engage in sabotage and targeted assassinations --- as well as planting disinformation to amplify disunity within their adversaries.
Contrary to a view probably held by many in my generation during the Cold War -- that the Soviet Union was calculatingly exploiting wars in the Developing World to expand the Soviet Bloc under the thrall of communism --- "Cold War Liberation", taking advantage of newly released declassified files from the former Soviet Union -- reveals a far different picture of Soviet intentions and policy with Portugal's African colonies.
Under Khruschev, Soviet focus was more upon Europe and the US --- little thought given to addressing the restive Third World. However, with Kruschev's downfall in 1964, his successors under Brezhnev, sought to change this --- motivated by ideology, but also by a feeling that the USSR needed to do more to stand up to America and to ensure that it had access to military and economic resources in Africa. However, even so, contrary to the perceived policy of communist world domination, internally, Soviet Union policy in reality was more reactive than proactive in this regard. Allies like Czechoslovakia (in the early stages of the revolutions in the Portuguese colonies), and, later, Cuba seem more to have taken the initiative in aiding the resistance groups, urging the Soviet Union to get more involved. Also, China, by the late 60s, a rival for leadership of the communist world, began training and indoctrinating resistance leaders and fighters from the colonies. Fearing that China would be able to gain prestige in the developing world from this at the Soviet Union's expense, Soviet leaders only then began to increase their involvement in Portugal's colonies.
In addition, contrary to the perception of Soviet policy as being opaque and monolithic, Soviet African policy was more the net output of a rivalry between its Communist Party's International Bureau --- which sought to spread world revolution in Africa --- and other players such as in the Foreign Ministry, concerned about creating unnecessary and costly distractions with respect to improved relations with the West, and in the GRU and Soviet military, concerned about expenditure of their resources for these various resistance groups, with potentially little gain in return for them. In reality, especially in comparison with US effort in Vietnam, the Soviet military aid expenditure in the Portuguese colonies was fairly parsimonious --- not much than a few million dollars per year.
The book goes into detail on the various rivalries and maneuverings within the resistance groups as well as their efforts to court greater and greater Soviet support for their cause.
However, the seminal event that finally put an end to Portuguese efforts to hold onto their empire was a military revolt in Portugal --- the Carnation Revolution. After 14 years, Portugal's military had realized that further fighting in the African colonies was wasteful and futile --- and immediately they began negotiations with the respective resistance groups in each colony for an end to the fighting and for independence.
While, for the most part, Portugal's handoff of power to FRELIMO in Mozambique and to PAIGC in Guinea Bissau went fairly smoothly, not so in Angola. Angola's resistance, divided into 3 rival armed groups, made it difficult for the Portuguese even to coordinate to whom to give power. The result: a power vacuum. The Portuguese simply pulled out their forces, and free for all ensued between the MPLA, the FNLA, and UNITAS --- and, further adding to the chaos, other nations, Zaire, Cuba, and South Africa intervened, each in the effort to protect their interests. Seeing South Africa invade Angola from Namibia and occupy most of southwestern Angola practically unopposed moved the Soviet Union, formerly tight-fisted, to increase its involvement in Angola, sending massive airlifts and shipments of weapons to the MPLA.
That would result in the MPLA controlling the Angolan capitol, Luanda, and managing to fend off its two rivals, long enough to gain international recognition as the Government of Angola. While Angolan War for Independence had ended, now, Angola would descend into another 15 years of civil war --- only abating until the 1990s.
I thought it interesting how the Soviet policy in an area such as this was different from what I had perceived it to be during my youth when I lived during the Cold War --- as much the case with other nations making foreign and military policy decisions --- Soviet policy with respect to the Portuguese colonies and their liberation movements --- was an overall output of various factions within it, motivated variously by publicly stated ideals and ideology and by internal pragmatic concerns. I recommend this book for those interested in learning more about the internal workings of the former Soviet Union, for those interested in learning how the Cold War effected the Third World, and for those interested in learning about the decolonization of Africa.
February 2, 2026
A good book about Luso-Africa as a front for the Cold War and the international influences on their liberation movements. I think it could have gone into a little more detail about some of the long term affects this had on these former Portuguese colonies and their development but overall a very well put together book.
July 17, 2025
Open access ebook published by University of North Carolina Press
https://uncpress.org/book/97814696658...
This history book is about the anti-colonial wars in Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea-Bissau - Portugal's African colonies - from 1961 to just after the Carnation Revolution. As these were proxy wars between the USA and USSR, the value here compared to older books on the subject is Telepneva's access to the Soviet archives, which Russia had open from 2015 until getting sanctioned for invading Ukraine.
I found it interesting how little Krushchev, Brezhnev and the Politburo cared that a Catholic dictatorship was still practicing colonialism. The African Marxists only had access to mid-level bureaucrats and Czechoslovakia until Cuba sent more than a thousand special forces. I was definitely glad to get these interesting facts about two lesser-known theatres of the Cold War.
https://uncpress.org/book/97814696658...
This history book is about the anti-colonial wars in Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea-Bissau - Portugal's African colonies - from 1961 to just after the Carnation Revolution. As these were proxy wars between the USA and USSR, the value here compared to older books on the subject is Telepneva's access to the Soviet archives, which Russia had open from 2015 until getting sanctioned for invading Ukraine.
I found it interesting how little Krushchev, Brezhnev and the Politburo cared that a Catholic dictatorship was still practicing colonialism. The African Marxists only had access to mid-level bureaucrats and Czechoslovakia until Cuba sent more than a thousand special forces. I was definitely glad to get these interesting facts about two lesser-known theatres of the Cold War.
February 21, 2023
A concise overview of the lead actors and action of liberation movements in Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, and Angola and their support from the Soviet Union in the 1960s and 1970s. Emphasis is placed on the African leaders and the mid-level Soviet bureaucrats (mezhdunarodniki) who played a large role in Soviet policy formation often due to pervious lack of interaction. Ideological considerations were another important factor stressed in the book as many of the actors came from a Marxist perspective of imperialism. The struggle of building up parties and gaining local legitimacy as leaders of national independence included not only dealing with local rivals and splinter groups but in gaining and keeping international support from the Eastern Block. Telepneva's well organized book of a very convoluted story in a fine addition to the New Cold War history series.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews