Alright, It's getting ridiculous. In times of great crisis, in times of great need, and in times of great danger to oneself, there are virtually no homosexuals. Homosexuals generally come from the most prosperous societies, and the whole "the lesbian turns down the alpha male in favor of wanting to.... do something with a woman" is ridiculous. It doesn't exist even now and this narrative in modern story telling either shows an agenda or ignorance.
This author chooses the first chapter of the third book to push this nonsense. No, homosexuality is not this prevalent, and, yes, in history when times are perilous people tend to think in terms of procreation. If you want to be gay, be gay, but the fact that these totally nonsensical societal paradigms are constantly pushed is ridiculous, and shows that they need to be lobbied for to continue.
Please focus on writing a good story. If you want to talk about someone being gay or incredibly adventurous in their sex life in the height of ancient Rome by the highest of society, that makes perfect sense. Why can't you come to terms with it? It most likely would never have occurred to the people in this society to even think about homosexuality.
Why does everything have to include this? Is it because you can't write a coherent story and will get some woke points by saying that a character randomly wants women in a tale about dangerous times.
These authors are just woke fools spinning the same stories with woke sprinkles. Michael Manning, gone, and now AC Cobble. Who will be next?