There is no such position as 'a banking insider' in banks. I'm wondering just how well the author knows the industry... If I do read it after all, the chances are I'll rant non-stop.
UPD. Well, I read it. I shouldn't have. It turned out to be a non-thrilling thriller devoted to Assad-bashing... A mediocre, at best, example of propaganda fiction. And it's not the propaganda that's meh, it's everything else:
- where is the suspense?
- the plot - riddled with holes and lacking in sense!
- the cardboard characters...
> WTF psychology and character dev. For example, the wife spends several pages in misery and then goes in Nancy Drue mode. Or the journalist who goest from wanting to marry Grant to considering her 'electricity' with Owen within 3 pages of inane text and back to Grant, within another page. What the hell is wrong with these robotic women who have no feelings for their boyfriends or husbands? People have been known to show more feeling to passers-by on a street or to random strangers!
> WTF Security. Mathew, doing his lettering with the DOJ person from his work laptop!!! I'm sorry, has he been taking notes much from Hillary Clinton's book? Imagine you're thinking of going whistleblower on some shady organisation you work with, would you do it from their laptop assigned to you (and most likely closely monitored!)?
> WTF Industry. The 'banker' is not a 'banker' but an 'in house lawyer'... The book, halfway through mischristens him a banker... It's a minor but irritating feature, since it shows no internal knowledge of the industry. So, the 'banker's wife' is, in fact, a 'bank's lawyer's wife'.
Another thing is that there is no understanding of the industry demonstrated: how the transfers were carried out, what happens when you change banks, how clients are vetted within the banks - all of this could have been fodder for a real thriller! And there isn't a word on anything remotely industry-related. How did the lawyer get their hands on accounting info? Or did he? Actually, emails usually don't contain financial databases. Photos of people of the bank doing business with shady clients? How exactly would a lawyer get that info? Banks don't film their employees going about their daily business (outside of the office, of course). And anyway, such data management would have been a process of security dep not the legal...
> Cliches on rampage... Syria, IT specialists, stay-at-home-wives, journalists, bankers (especially horribly clicheed...) From this book no one would have guessed that employees of banks are 1. human and 2. have lots of professions, qualifications, specializations and functions!!!
> Propaganda writing. Made me want to reread this little and totally underrated gem of Ian McEwan's: Sweet Tooth. In that novel authors were being surreptitiously funded by a government agency to write novels about things that the government agency in question wanted popularized... This book actually felt like a case of such writing, what with it incorporating most of the recent 'sensational' headlines. So, whether it's a case compulsive newspaper quoting or somethings more interesting, still, the ideas are not original.
> FPPV: FacePalm Plot Vehicles. Why the fuck would an agency willing to hush-hush a plane murder give the wife photos? Why these photos would be easily found online? Why the frigg, would the wife's arts edu give her supposedly an edge to being an insta Nancy Drew with these pics or the journalist gal would instantly be a 'good investigator'? I like more than my fair share of Mary Sues but this is all very unplausible and not even explained or used to improve the plot by much.
I am giving it the +1 star for the happy end, which I'm a total sucker for. And even that happy end, they managed to make rather forced and unlively! How did they pull it off?
The overall rating had a very good chance to get negative, so I decided to count the small blessings in it, for once (I was in a very good mood, this weekend):
- the happy end (+1 star)
- banking industry could have been an interesting subject (it wasn't shown in this book, even rudimentarily, still, it had the potential, however left undeveloped) (+0.5 stars)
- there was that secretary who could have been an interesting character and wasn't (a shame!). (+0.5 stars)
- +0.5 star for the effort and trying to come up with a book.
- +0.5 star for reminding me to reread Evan McEwan's 'Sweet Tooth'.
So, 3 stars overall. And I'm being too generous. I might come back and detract a bunch of them at a later date, when I'm in a worse mood, I think... Hmm....
Q:
“That’s love, then, isn’t it? A connection. Electricity. You feel it in your gut. I felt it when I first saw you. I still feel it when I see you.” (c)
Q:
How much of what happened at Swiss United was just optics? (с)
Q:
Everyone who was anyone was here. (c)
Q:
There must be something else on here that proves that Reiss is Client 437-65-9881. Maybe that’s his Social Security number? (с) This is one of the stupidest things I've ever read. And I've done me some traipsing in that realm…
Q:
“You’re not much of an investigative journalist, are you?” (c) No, she isn't. Especially in the context of the above-mentioned SSN 'idea'.
Q:
There it was: a numbered account at Swiss United, with the same amount: $73,542,980.11. (c) Actually, that would be weird of itself, since the transfer should have incurred fees, which would more often than not been deducted from the amount of the transfer. The only thing with this amount would be the operation statement.
Q:
11:45 p.m. …
Even in the middle of the night, Zoe looked fresh-faced and chic… (c) 11:45 isn't the middle of the night, actually.
Q:
Bashar al-Assad, for example.”
“The Syrian dictator?” … The videos and photographs coming out of Syria were horrifying. Chemical attacks. Cities reduced to rubble. ... (c) How unconventional, to put blatant propaganda in a novel.
Q:
“Insane. Honest to God, we should be checking in with this guy regularly to make sure he’s still alive. It takes serious cojones to steal data in real time. Most sources steal it and bolt. This guy is just stealing it, sending it to us, and stealing some more.” (c)
Q:
Everything about Jonas was intentional. He wanted you to know that he was above you. For God’s sake, he was above the weather. (c)I think this was meant to impress the reader. It didn't work with me. Humans have been able to mitigate the effects of weather since ages ago, what with all the novel for the author inventions: fire, homes and heated transport. So... it's old news for most of us.
Issues with editing (-1 star), for example:
Q:
They literally just talk about what they’re doing like its business as usual. (c)