Swayed by his charismatic intellectual mentor [Jacov Reinhardt], the hypochondriac narrator of this tale follows Jacov into the Uruguayan jungle, in search of a mystical and wise prophet of melancholy.
I was sold by the description of this tale, and by the fact that comparisons were made, on the back, to Thomas Bernhard, Roberto Bolaño and Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo.
The Bernhard influence is the most prevalent, in fact, it is obvious; spiteful intellectual character in manic pursuit, digressive syntax, and frequent locutionary framing; as in the many uses of "he said and I wrote" when relaying conversations within a tale-telling setup.
Very little actually happens in the story's real-time. Most is told in remembrances from the author, and almost all of it is focused on Jacov's maddening obsession with melancholy, a topic, the only topic, that he, Jacov, spends all his mental faculties on, and the reason behind the trip to Uruguay, having earlier brought the party to Germany, Hungary and Lev Tolstoy's mansion in Russia.
Jacov is a fun character; completely deluded by his belief in his own genius, and obsessively convinced he can burrow into the depths of melancholy, and find something valuable to the world, and himself. He is deluded to the point where he, not only misreads, but completely inverts the philosophical works of a so-called "melancholic prophet", to fit his own needs [the actual text is not about melancholy, but about finding happiness, but Jacov translates it to be about his own favorite topic instead]. That was quite funny, and the narrator's hopelessly misguided optimism at the end was also worth a chuckle.
However, the book lacked heart to me. The characters were fun caricatures, but not engaging as people. It is a sort of satire of crazed intellectual ambition and self-delusion, which is a theme that feels archaic, like the 20th-century European writing style that Mark Haber imitates.
I have no issue with choosing to write a book in this style, and the style was well done, the text was well written as a single paragraph without typographic denotations between interlocutors, which is hard to do right.
But the lack of any emotion or "realness", and the feeling that the book doesn't want to get at something; a lack of intent or purpose, leaves it as a fun, well-written book, with a bit of a hollow center.