Girls Who Lie is the second novel in Eva Björg Ægisdóttir’s Forbidden Iceland series, featuring Detective Elma. The story deliberately misdirects the reader through two timelines, and the identity of the murderer is only fully revealed very late.
The basic mystery :
Maríanna is a troubled young single mother living in Akranes. She has a long history of alcohol/drug problems and depression and has repeatedly neglected her daughter, Hekla.
Seven months before the main investigation, Maríanna disappears. She leaves a note apologising and apparently indicating that she intends to end her life. Because of her history, the police initially accept that explanation.
Then two boys discover a badly decomposed body hidden in a cave in the Grábrók lava fields. The body is identified as Maríanna, but the post-mortem establishes that she did not die by suicide: she had been violently attacked and murdered.
Elma and Sævar therefore have to reopen the old disappearance investigation.
Hekla’s troubled childhood
Hekla is fifteen.
Her childhood explains why suspicion initially falls around almost everyone connected with her.
When Hekla was about three, Maríanna disappeared for several days, leaving the little girl alone without food or water. Hekla was consequently placed with Bergrún and Fannar, a couple who became her foster/support family.
Years later Maríanna again disappeared for several weeks. Bergrún and Fannar wanted to adopt Hekla, but Maríanna refused. Eventually Hekla was allowed to stay with them regularly.
MSo, after Maríanna’s disappearance, Hekla appears to have finally acquired the stable family life she had always wanted. But Elma becomes increasingly suspicious that Hekla isn’t telling the whole truth.
The other story — the mysterious mother and daughter
Interspersed with Elma’s investigation are disturbing first-person passages.
We follow an unnamed young mother from the birth of her daughter through the girl’s childhood.
The mother is emotionally detached from the baby almost from birth. She struggles to bond with her and repeatedly describes her inability to understand or love her daughter normally.
As the child grows, it becomes clear that something is very unusual about the girl.
She has difficulty understanding other people’s emotions and behaviour and learns to imitate what other people do. She is bullied and isolated and gradually becomes extremely good at concealing what she is actually thinking.
These passages are the novel’s biggest piece of misdirection. We initially assume that this mother and daughter must somehow be connected to Maríanna and Hekla in the obvious way.
They aren’t.
The investigation widens
Elma and Sævar begin interviewing everyone connected with Maríanna and Hekla.
They look at:
* Maríanna’s father
* Hekla
* Bergrún and Fannar
* Hekla’s friend Tinna
* Tinna’s mother Margret
* people associated with Maríanna’s relationships and troubled past
The investigation becomes particularly interested in Tinna and Margret.
There are uncomfortable parallels between the two families:
Maríanna → Hekla
and
Margret → Tinna
Both relationships involve mothers and daughters, secrets, manipulation and conflicting versions of reality.
The title Girls Who Lie consequently applies on several levels: the girls aren’t necessarily lying for the same reasons, and adults around them are also concealing things.
The major twist :
The biggest revelation concerns the identity of the mysterious mother and daughter from the flashback sections.
The girl in those sections is Tinna.
And the mother is Margret.
The reader has been led to believe that the disturbing childhood story belongs to someone directly connected with Maríanna. Instead, it is the backstory of Tinna and Margret.
This completely changes how we interpret the seemingly innocent relationship between the two.
Tinna has spent much of her life learning how to behave by watching and copying other people. Margret, meanwhile, is far more calculating and manipulative than she initially appears.
The novel then begins to reveal how the two stories — Maríanna/Hekla and Margret/Tinna — intersect.
What actually happened to Maríanna?
The final revelations show that Maríanna’s murder is connected to Margret and Tinna, rather than being a straightforward revenge killing by Hekla or an act committed by one of the obvious suspects.
Margret has been manipulating the situation and controlling the narrative around Tinna.
The shocking element is that Tinna is not simply the helpless, strange child we have been encouraged to see her as. Her understanding of people and her ability to imitate them make her capable of concealing much more than anyone realises.
The truth surrounding Maríanna’s death emerges through the relationship between Margret and Tinna and the lies they have constructed.
This is why the ending can feel somewhat morally uncomfortable: the mystery is solved, but justice is not as clean or satisfying as the reader might expect. One contemporary review specifically noted that the ending leaves a feeling that justice has not been completely served.
And what about Hekla?
One of the cleverest aspects of the ending is that Hekla is not the monster the reader may temporarily suspect her to be.
Her resentment towards Maríanna is completely understandable. She has suffered because of her mother’s neglect and has grown up surrounded by adults who make decisions about her life.
But the investigation gradually separates Hekla’s anger and difficult behaviour from actual responsibility for Maríanna’s murder.
The apparent clues pointing toward Hekla are therefore another example of the novel’s central theme: people see a troubled girl and immediately construct a story about what she must have done.
The final pages :
Once the murder mystery is essentially resolved, the novel gives considerable attention to Elma and Sævar.
There has been an obvious attraction between them throughout the investigation. Elma has also been involved casually with her neighbour Jakob, but her emotional connection with Sævar is different.
The ending suggests that Elma and Sævar may finally be moving beyond being merely colleagues.
But Ægisdóttir deliberately doesn’t give the reader a conventional romantic resolution. Their relationship is left open, providing a thread into the next book.
So, in one sentence
Maríanna’s supposed suicide turns out to be murder; Elma’s investigation exposes a web of dysfunctional mother-daughter relationships and deception, ultimately revealing that the apparently peripheral Margret and Tinna are central to the crime, while the mysterious childhood narrative has been deliberately disguising their identity and role.
The novel’s final message is essentially that people lie for very different reasons — some to protect themselves, some to manipulate others, and some simply because the truth is unbearable — and outsiders are remarkably quick to believe the wrong story. This theme is central to the book’s construction. I would give the story and book 4 stars.
Dr. Javed Rasheed