ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Only read this bc of a mandatory uni exam. So boring, horribly written, and decorated with SO MANY HORRENDOUS MISTAKES?! The most rampant one being the paragraph where they said Weber advocated for the superiority of the principle of Verantwortung. No he did not. It's also very shallow. Does not even scratch the tip of the iceberg and I'm left with more questions than I had when I started. And not in the good way. Just in the "this book is so shallow and unsatisfactory" way.