Boy do I have some feelings about this book, so buckle up.
It was really hard for me to decide whether to give this book a 3- or 4-star rating. I may have decided on 3, but that doesn't mean I'm really satisfied with my answer. My conundrum is this: I really enjoyed the plot and premise and even the characters, but there were so many little things that bothered me that I just had a hard time fully enjoying it like I wanted to.
The best thing about the book is easily the ending. Things come together, it's super satisfying to read - I won't spoil it by going further but it really made me almost bump up that rating to 4. The reason I didn't is just that I feel like that wouldn't be representative of my experience as a whole.
While reading this book, a lot of things stuck out to me (beware minor spoilers below):
- The female characters who narrate are all casually self-depricating. They make comments like "oh god that was such a bitchy thing to say" or something and it just feels... Weird. Out of place. Pretty jarring. Like... From a different era of feminism.
-Alice is a weird character. She's the girl you read about in the description, but the book focuses way more (and does a much better job imho) on Lily and Daphne. Alice has a thing where she blushes? At everything? What? She's so bizarrely naive in a way that just doesn't make sense for a girl her age, not even a slightly sheltered one. I think the most problems I had in the writing were in her chapters. It's like reading about a freaky-Friday-child-in-an-adult-body situation.
-Also, regarding Alice, she doesn't even feel consistent. She's shy when it serves the narrative and talkative when it serves the narrative. I just didn't buy into the repeated explanation the author would give, which was basically that she "forgot to be anxious because she was so excited"? Which, speaking as someone with anxiety, is not how that works.
-Alexander, as a character, is just there for two reasons. First, for other characters to have someone to talk to (even tho he doesn't reply) and second, to be Alice's love interest. Even though I have to admit it's kinda cute, I feel like the author relies way too much on the reader grasping the archetype of 'big strong silent viking type' to get them invested in the relationship. I just don't feel like Alice and Alexander spend enough time together doing anything meaningful to justify their romance at the end. Fun fact, the problem with silent characters is that they. Don't say anything.
-Plus, the author is also trying to balance so many other relationships: Daphne and Philip, Lily and Luc, Lily and Jacob, Daphne and Lily, Alice and Elise, Elise and Henri... It's a short book. The hit has to be taken somewhere. Weird choice to make it the character you're marketing the book with. The frustrating thing is that all the stories told through all of these relationships have potential to be really incredible! But I feel like because there's so many of them we never get much beyond surface level archetypes with any of them.
-The writing can be really on the nose. There were lots of places I marked in my book where the narrator felt a little bit over the top, or the dialogue just felt too cliche, too unnatural, totally unlike something someone would say in real life.
-In addition, the author doesn't really seem to trust the reader to catch on to subtext - which, I think, ultimately leads to those really cliche lines and stuff.
-I didn't feel like the book has a proper 3/4 climax. Like, it had a great ending, but the windup to the ending lasts a while and almost feels like the author is using that to substitute a climax. Or maybe I'm just reading it wrong? Either way, I coulda gone for something a little more gripping closer to the middle.
-The author uses some technological language that I really don't think serves her purpose. It hits okay occasionally, but a lot of the time it really comes off as an older person who's trying to relate to the new young hires in their office by saying 'YOLO' and 'IRL." Just a tad out of touch. Plus, I just don't feel like it was necessary for her to date the story by including them. They don't add enough.
I have so many thoughts but I won't burden you with them all here. My copy of this book is full of notes.
Ultimately, I have to say, I did still enjoy this book. It's an easy light read that I ate up in just a few sessions of reading - a lovely change of pace from the Game of Thrones and Lord of the Rings that I've been working through. And the story, while a bit flawed, is really interesting. I love the idea of investigating old history as a concept for a novel and the author puts her experience in the field to good use here.
This is the first book by this author and I feel like some of the problems would just be ironed out with more experience (and more time dedicated to fewer characters). I'll definitely be reading upcoming books from this author still.