Audiobook version narrated by Keith Szarabajka
Runtime 7:41
This book had some interesting stories and lore in it, some known and some not. The history sections on mediumship, spiritualism, and psychics were far too long and repetitive. This may have been an editing issue, but it felt more like there wasn’t enough material to fulfill the word count so huge sections were repeated multiple times throughout the book. Some were worded differently and some were the exact same sentences over and over. The majority of the book focused on these topics and exhaustive details of the people involved and their tricks than it did on the ghosts they were supposedly conjuring. A huge part was also focused on magicians and their acts rather than supernatural instances or even pretend supernatural instances. It just felt like the book was described and titled incorrectly.
The mediumship/spiritualism sections were so long and drawn out it was hard sticking with the book. The repetition likely played a huge role in this. I found myself constantly losing interest in this book because I was just bored with hearing the same thing over and over. The two largest sections of this book are just repeating info already given. Spiritualists of the time did play the same cons over and over of course, but maybe just highlighting a couple of the notorious ones or a couple of the lesser known ones would’ve been a better read versus hearing about dozens of them who all had the same act and same gimmicks. It just got really boring, really fast and what should’ve taken a day to listen to took two weeks to finally finish with large sections having to be restarted because I realized I’d zoned out for far too long or I’d fallen asleep yet again.
The actual ghost stories and hauntings were interesting and I was hoping for more of this than the magician/medium topics. There were a small handful I hadn’t heard before. Details on these sections were very uneven and sparse. This book did however make me want to look some stories up for further reading so I gave it two stars for this.
The writing is just ok. I listened to the audiobook, but it was very clear there were a lot of errors in the text. The narrator read these errors straight through so he was reading what he was given. Whole sections felt more like a textbook or book report than engaging storytelling. Part of this was due to a dry narrative in areas but mostly it was just the content and wording that made these places very boring and feel like they lagged. The author is an historian and that may have accounted for the textbook nature of this book versus a storyteller book. I would not describe this as a “fascinating journey through supernatural history.” I can’t stress enough how badly this felt like a textbook.
I did find the information on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and his belief in spiritualism and mediumship very interesting. The cons this poor man fell for baffle me since he’s considered such a clever writer of his time. He was a clear example of how grief caused people to fall victim to the tricks these con artists pulled and why spiritualists were so popular despite how silly they seem today. I also really enjoyed the contrast between him and Houdini. Again, focusing on a few of the spiritualists of the time and how they were contrasted with these two men would’ve been more enjoyable than stating the same thing dozens of times to cover every spiritualist of the time. When every chapter has the two men presenting the same arguments, the reader loses interest.
The narration was ok. I felt the narrator really tried to have a range of voices, accents, dialects and attitudes, his voice was just unfortunately very dry and flat. It wasn’t that he didn’t have different voices, they just weren’t captivating. Even changing voices, the tone remained pretty flat and monotone which did not help with making the content less dry and more engaging. Because he did seem to have a good range in voices, it may be the content was too flat and dry moreso than his actual narration. It’s honestly hard to say because even with new information presented in sections, I was still left feeling like the reading was monotone and bland. Even the most interesting parts felt being and had my mind wandering in equal measure as the most boring parts that the narrator excelled with variety in voices presented.
This was probably a better read than listen regardless, but I’m not sure I’d recommend it given the repetition, bland, basic writing, and the uneven quality of material. It was a good intro for some new people, events, and stories to look up, but wholly forgettable otherwise.