Thank you to NetGalley and Wednesday Books/St. Martin’s Press for providing me with a complimentary digital ARC of this novel in exchange for an honest review!
I’m really saddened to give this book such a low rating. I kept hoping it would get better, but it didn’t, so I’m not comfortable rating this any higher than 1 star. The novel just didn’t work for me in so many ways. I will try to write a constructive review, though, explaining what I did not enjoy and how I think the book might be improved.
Where Darkness Blooms has such an intriguing premise, along with a gorgeous cover. Four girls in their late teens have lived together for years with their single mothers in the small Kansas town of Bishop, surrounded by sunflowers and riddled with frequent storms. Two years ago, their mothers disappeared without a trace. Women frequently go missing or die at young ages in Bishop, but no one seems to question it. When the townspeople eventually create a memorial for their mothers, the girls start uncovering long-hidden secrets. What exactly is going on in Bishop, and what really happened to their mothers? I love a good, spooky read about land taking on its own personality, so I was excited to read this novel.
I would argue there are a few big issues that made the story difficult for me to enjoy, so I’ll try to explain them.
First, the decision to set the novel two years after the mothers’ disappearance didn’t make sense to me. The first 20% of the book consists of the characters slowly revealing the circumstances around the disappearance, their relationships with their mothers, and other important backstories. That significantly slowed down the pace. It also was hard for me to believe that the daughters didn’t investigate the disappearance for two years straight. Surely, at least one of them would have tried to understand what happened. Some of the clues they find throughout the story are easy to uncover (I’ll talk more about that in a bit); if they had even somewhat attempted to dig deeper into the mystery earlier, they would have made so much more progress. The novel would have been better if it were set before the mothers disappeared, so the reader could get a glimpse of their relationships and the group’s dynamic. If the author truly wanted to set the novel after the disappearance, then maybe six months later would have been more logical.
I also had trouble getting a grasp on the town and the characters’ daily lives. The story starts right before the mothers’ memorial, which kicks off the girls’ investigation. This novel actually helped me articulate a common problem I have with thrillers— sometimes they try to get to the action too quickly without letting the reader learn about the characters and the setting. I wasn’t sure why this bothered me until I read Where Darkness Blooms, which does very little setting up of the town. Since I was thrown into the action with no worldbuilding, I never got a clear image of Bishop and how it functioned on a day-to-day basis. Similarly, I never got to see the characters’ relationships with one another before they were stressed by the plot. Therefore, I had trouble understanding the setting, and I found so many plot points didn’t make sense because of it (why are no townspeople suspicious of the deaths? Does no one ever go to the hospital? What is “normal” to this group of people, and is it the same normal as our current society? Those are just a few questions I had). Reading the novel felt like staring at an unfinished painting: the main focus was clear, but everything in the background was clouded and underdeveloped.
I am a very character-driven reader, and there were far too many characters for this short of a book. The four main women had similar voices, so when the chapters shifted in focus between them, I frequently had a hard time telling who was speaking and remembering their backstories. On top of that, there were three mothers, and it was difficult to track each mother’s personality and their relationship with their daughter(s), particularly because we only saw the mothers in flashbacks. I didn’t find any of the characters likable, because none of them were developed past their initial archetypes. Whitney and Bo could have been the same character without affecting the plot much, and the mothers could have been combined, as well. Additionally, all of the male side characters were bad people. The author probably did that intentionally to further her themes, but reading about two of the women constantly longing for them got so old so quickly.
The writing in the novel is decent. I appreciated how the author tried to instill heavy themes about intergenerational trauma and the harms of societal expectations. The imagery is strong, which is nice. However, sometimes I found the writing to be a little overdramatic (there were a handful of one-liners that made me roll my eyes). There is also quite a bit of repetition, especially in descriptions. Repeated imagery as a theme is fine, but the adjectives and words themselves could have been more varied.
The story’s pacing went between too slow and too quick. There was so much that could have been cut from the middle and the end. There was too much time spent with the characters running inside from a storm and going out to the clearing to investigate something. It was as if the author had a few set places she wanted the novel to take place, and she only used those locations (which again, didn’t make the world feel developed). It also felt like the plot was reaching its climax from about the 40% point onward. The characters kept uncovering new things and making new revelations. There was little time to absorb one discovery before another was made. This could be improved by adding chapters between the discoveries making each individual breakthrough more challenging to obtain. It was too convenient that they just so happened to continually find groundbreaking evidence with little effort.
There were many smaller details that bothered me while reading. Most of them likely could have been prevented with better editing. For example, many problems could have been solved by texting or calling another character. We do see the characters occasionally text, so I knew they had working phones. The women also never seemed to communicate with one another at all about important topics. I know that’s a common theme in fiction, but there were some things they just should have noticed after living together for so long. The small town setting didn’t always make sense with the characters’ actions (like Bennett apparently had never met Delilah until two years prior— I don't believe they're the same exact age, but they likely ran in similar circles and would have encountered each other before then). Some scenarios were repeated too often, such as bonfires. There were two bonfires that were important to the plot, and I kept getting them confused. An editor could have suggested that one of them be a different activity (high schoolers in a small town have to do SOMETHING ELSE, right?). I could keep going on, but you get the point.
I won’t even get into the ending, but it seemed wildly unrealistic and created a bunch of plot holes.
This novel had a great deal of potential, but it fell flat for me. With more editing and some revisions, I think this could be a really strong story. The themes and allegory were interesting, and I appreciated how naturally some of the LGBTQ+ characters were represented. Even if a novel has an important message, it should still be an enjoyable read, though. This one was not fun for me, but I may be in the minority.
1 out of 5 stars.