What do you think?
Rate this book


433 pages, ebook
First published June 29, 2021
"Many people woke up on November 9, 2016, feeling like their country hated them."A both succinct and broad statement. Some of us have felt this way prior to November 9th. My guess is that's the day it became apparent to a much larger group of people still grappling with the notion of systemic social justice issues had implications that finally creeped into their own lives. Knowledge of the "cruel" aspects finally reached their middle class suburban existence. Serwer lays his case out methodically with chapters on the backlash from electing Obama, civil war never ended (lost cause), national delusion (we are not nor have we ever been what we say we are), lack of civility (the resentment of righting wrongs), mob mentality (everyone I know feels this way), white nationalism, conspiracy theories, exclusion (who is and isn't American), Supreme Court, COVID, police accountability (lack thereof), and of course the character of Trump himself as an avatar of grievance for the nation. Serwer is a historian and he has catalogued a rather niche subject that in my view captures much of what is America right now. It's a great book. Serwer is young and very smart. Personal opinion, he is compelling but I wasn't totally convinced. It could be a matter of mood for me when I read it. But right off in the first chapter he said
"The reality, however, is that political violence is less common in the present than it has been at many points in American history"My first thought was "Yeah, as long as you are not counting the mass shootings all over the nation". The sentence just didn't age well and frankly I don't think it was true when he wrote it much less after the attack on Nancy Pelosi's home or Kavanaugh or Scalise getting shot or the Biden campaign bus being run off the road or Gov Whitmer's attempted kidnapping, or poll workers lives being threatened etc. It seemed like a casual observation tossed out because it seemed both counter intuitive and obvious. But without context, it seems like a youthful indulgence. It did affect the way I read the rest of the book. Also, appropriately this book was less about Trump than the Trump era because the author rightly suggests, Trump is a catalyst not the origin of "Trumpism". Serwer is a good writer. It was an interesting read and in my view he's spot on about almost all of it.
So America stands at the precipice of a Second Redemption. Unlike the first, it was not achieved by violence and has not ended in the total disenfranchisement of people of color. Its immediate consequences may not be as total or as dire. Yet it has a democratic legitimacy that extends far beyond the American South. The erasure of the legacy of the first black president of the United States will be executed by a man who rose to power on the basis of his embrace of the slander that Obama was not born in America.The following excerpt from Chapter 4, titled “The Cruelty of Reconciliation” which is the introductory remarks for the original article titled “Civility is Overrated” (written December 2019) The following quote is taken from the introduction part which was written after January 6, 2021.
“Hate, fear, and intimidation” are a concise summary of the politics of a candidate who not only ran on promises of mass deportations, Muslim bans, and birtherism but those of a president who used his authority to coerce others to intervene in elections on his behalf. While Biden was appealing to civility, Trump was attempting to coerce the leader of Ukraine to implicate Biden in a nonexistent crime. As Biden was promising to govern on behalf of all Americans regardless of party affiliation, Trump was attempting to intimidate Republican state legislatures into overturning their election results. When Biden and his transition team were leading with the Trump administration for cooperation, the president was sending a mob to sack the Capitol building in an effort to keep him in power.The book's title is taken from Chapter 5, its introduction is titled The Cruelty of the Mob and the title of the original essay is The Cruelty Is the Point (written October 3, 2018). The following excerpt from that essay provides a summary explanation of why cruelty is an essential component of Trump's appeal.
Trump’s only true skill is the con; his only fundamental belief is that the United States is the birthright of straight, white, Christian men, and his only real, authentic pleasure is in cruelty. It is that cruelty, and the delight it brings them, that binds his most ardent supporters to him, in shared scorn for those they hate and fear: immigrants, black voters, feminists, and treasonous white men who empathize with any of those who would steal their birthright. The president’s ability to execute that cruelty through word and deed makes them euphoric. It makes them feel good, it makes them feel proud, it makes them feel happy, it makes them feel united.Chapter 12 has an introductory essay titled The Cruelty of the Code of Silence and the original essay (written in Spring of 2021) is titled Abolish Police Unions. The following excerpts explain why Police Unions are different from other public employee unions in that they invariability want to bargain for a license to kill.
This is not a system ruined by a few bad apples. This is a system that creates and protects bad apples by design.Link to article titled, "Cruelty is the Point," by Adam Kotsko (not author of this book)
… … …
The question is why there should be police unions at all. Because the defining labor of police is violence, any police union is bound to eventually want to negotiate leniency for the misuse of violence by its members and to advocate not only for policies that guarantee that leniency but for politicians who will secure it. That guarantee is rooted in part in the racial disparities of police misconduct, which also insulate police from political backlash. That makes the preservation of such disparities a political interest for police unions, which can easily override the preferences of black officers, who tend to have more sympathy for the targets of police misconduct.