there is some really brilliant information in here and it is well worth reading!!! stearns brings up some really salient points about the processes of normalization, involution, and essentialization that have made "forever war" so profitable to elites in congo, rwanda, uganda, the US, the UK, China, and a handful of massive Western companies profitting off of widespread violence and chaotic destruction. i did knock off a star because i disagree with his belief in reform and the UN (though of course his faith in the UN makes sense as he was formerly on the UN peacekeeping mission). he is still highly critical and it is an invaluable text; i do think however his placing disappointment in a government agency for not "doing what it should" is a misconception. from everything i have learned from this text and others about the congo, this is neocolonialism intentionally propped up; regardless of whether the root cause is at times simply disinterest and a racist disregard rather than the blatant conspiratorial capitalist pillaging of other times.
" "As war -which itself stagnated and turned violently inward-constrains the space for agency more and more, so desperate inventiveness also turns in on itself. All forms of capital, material or cultural/ symbolic, are pressed into the service of elite profit or peasant survival."
Jackson is drawing here on the concept of involution, most famously developed by Clifford Geertz, who used it to describe how village society in Indonesia responded to population growth, Dutch colonization and the introduction of sugar as an export crop. Geertz argued that the social and economic structures of rice production did not fundamentally change but merely adapted to these temporary pressures. As a result, the paddies were cultivated more intensively, increasing output per area but not per head. It was a cultural practice, he wrote, that "having reached its definitive form, continued to develop by becoming internally more complicated... it maintained the overall outlines of that pattern while driving the elements of which it was composed to ever-higher degrees of ornate elaboration and Gothic intricacy.
A similar logic has obtained in the Congolese conflict. Over time, the main stakeholders' approach to the conflict turned inwards, becoming invested in their own reproduction, and then became stuck, seeing conflict as an end in itself. There is, however, no grand conspiracy but rather a multitude of actors stuck in a negative equilibrium. Army officers see the conflict as a way of maintaining inflated budgets, embezzling funds, and obtaining opportunities for racketeering at the local level. The national government treats the conflict as a means of coup-proofing by keeping senior commanders content, while the bulk of their troops are deployed far from the capital."