I suppose for a book titled “just thinking,” I shouldn’t have expected super clear, great arguments. It’s “just thinking,” after all, and so no thesis is given at the start, so it’s hard to know the audience and direction.
In most cases, I don’t actually disagree with the authors. I agree we need to have a biblical worldview behind our politics. The arguments were not the best, meandered, and were at times dismissive. They ascribe motives, make comments without substantiation (or leave out statistics that would give a rounder picture, so their arguments seem weak), and because they try to cram so many issues into the book, flatten complex discussions (ie, that anyone espousing Christian socialism is also subscribing to social gospel and imply false dichotomies such as since Jesus is the only one who can heal our hurts, we shouldn’t try to do it ourselves). Most concerning, there are a handful of times they say something is “the gospel” or “antithetical to the gospel,” when what is really meant is general biblical teaching or implications of the gospel. Maybe this confusion is why we have so many Christians claiming so many political issues are “gospel issues,” something that I often find untrue.
But because of what I ultimately concluded was their thesis (we need to have a biblical worldview behind our politics), I expected more constructing of a political theology from Scripture and less critiquing socialism and specific issues. They touch briefly on Romans 13 and how God’s sovereignty and human responsibility should shape our political views, but needed to flesh out what they think is the actual, biblical role of government—especially when their only critique of government education is that it shouldn’t become tyrannical or monopolistic.
I was critiquing it harder than most books 1) because these arguments are hot contemporary issues and so I want arguments that will hold up against differing views, and 2) I was confused by the trajectory of the book from the start, so was trying to figure out what was so off about it.
I don’t read many political books so can’t really say “read this instead,” but there was nothing in this book I haven’t heard elsewhere and instead I found many issues with it. If you agree with the authors, you’ve probably already come across all their arguments. If you disagree, this won’t do anything to convince you.