As a self-taught artist for over 50 years, I've often wondered why Otto Rank's contributions, especially in "Art and Artist," seem to be less acknowledged compared to his contemporaries like Carl Jung. This curiosity was reignited during my recent research on André Breton, the founder of the Surrealist movement.
Considering that Breton published the Surrealist Manifesto in 1924, just eight years before Rank's "Art and Artist" in 1932, I can't help but wonder if there was any personal connection or influence between these two radical thinkers. Did they ever cross paths, or were they aware of each other's groundbreaking work?
The enigma was resolved when I stumbled upon the foreword of "Art and Artist," written by Anais Nin, Henry Miller's muse during the 1930s in Paris. According to Anais Nin: "First of all this was the work of a rebel, of a man who stood in a symbolic father-and-son relation with Freud, and who dared to diversed from his theories. Such challenge of analready established and crystalized dogma is usually punished by repression, which is exactly what happened to Otto Rank. he disciples of Freud pursued a relentless excommunication which is only diminishing today with the men who practiced it. Rank was erased from the history of psychoanalysis and from public evaluation of psychoanalytical movements."..
Unlike Jung, Rank considered himself an artist, a poet, author and playwright, Otto Rank as a literary man, when he examines the creative personality it was not only as a psychologist (as Carl Jung would only be) but as an artist himself and moreover, "Art and Artist can be read both as an interpretation of Art itself." It is worth taking notice that Otto Rank was "preoccupied with social problems and felt individual therapy was not enough to solve our problems..."