Thematic Analysis, A Practical Guide really does what it sets out to do. It provides a detailed explanation on how to start, progress and complete reflective Thematic Analysis. This type of analysis is used to investigate data in a way that takes into account your context on the data selected as well as various sociopolitical and other contexts. It is not a process for simply reporting on what data says but what it means after you analyse it. The book has chapters on how to start, how to analyse your data, how to code your data as a prelude to identifying themes, how to write your report and ensure good quality. There is an accompanying website and at the end of each chapter there are study points, worked examples so you can practically follow the process with their example data and further reading on the chapters subject. There is also information for teachers and mentors to help others on the journey of Thematic Analysis.
I came to this book after attending a presentation for the Chartered Quality Institute where the presenter had used this method for analysis of trend data with a view to see how can this help me in my work as a Quality Manager. I don’t think it is something I would use as in engineering, unlike the authors psychology background, there is little scope for interpreting the meaning behind data which this method is particularly good for. However, with my background of analysis and audit I can see that this method would be great for that.
My only negative thoughts on the book are really about format. Firstly, the authors use of TA throughout the book instead of using the full Thematic Analysis term. There are lots of long scientific type words in this book repeated over and over again (ontological, epistemological for example and I felt it distracted from the “theme” of the book. Also the constant references in sentences e.g. “limits of 30-40 (MacQueen, McLellan, Kay & Milstein, 1998)” instead of just using superscript numbers to point the reader to a references section, particularly when it is several times in the middle of a sentence. I felt this really distracted me from the sentences and I often had to reread a sentence more than once to get by this. Also at the start of the book they suggest if you are new to Thematic Analysis you should read chapter 8 first. Surely a starter chapter should be at the start of the book!!
If you are someone wanting to understand Thematic Analysis and planning to implement it then this is a great book for you, although the authors suggest you read their previous paper “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology (2006) first.