I did not enjoy this book as much as the first and I don't think I care to read the next. Again, this is less a Darcy and Elizabeth story as their relationship has hardly any obstacles and they get engaged rather quickly. Even the rumors do almost nothing. This book is mostly about Jane Fairfax and she's just so dull!
But more than that, I got really tired of seemingly endless regency era cant and idioms and the way people spoke. Polished, refined, highly educated characters spoke like servants with "ain't no's" and just very sloppy language I can't remember right now. It seemed like every other line of dialogue had some expression of the time, which is appropriate to include but needs to be used in small doses otherwise it becomes difficult to follow when every conversation is full of odd expressions that aren't used anymore. And it felt as if the author was trying to impress with her regency knowlegde; like, how Regents Park was laid out and who designed it and how it was managed. Things that had absolutely no impact on the story at all.
Then, after an almost encyclopedic description of the park and the workings of Boodle's, very basic details were wrong. Such as the last earl of Matlock adding a wing onto Pemberley. Why? Pemberley is not the seat of the Matlocks. Jane Austen states that Pemberley is ten miles round the park, and Darcy's (rumored) income is £10k. Yet the author doubles both those figures. Why? (In fairness, his income was mentioned in the last book) It added nothing to the story.
There were also more grammatical errors in this one, or maybe I just noticed them more readily becuz I struggled to enjoy this story more than the last.
Oh, and I hate, HATE, when authors refer to Elizabeth as Lizzy every single time by everyone. Family, friends, Darcy, the narrator, people she just met...It drives me nuts! But that's just a personal pet peeve of mine.