I wish I had a time machine.
I would go back in time and gift this book to Meghan's father. Then he could read it to his daughter and they could spend some quality time together. Maybe they had a better relationship then. Oh... my bad. It is about the bond between a father and a son. Maybe Meghan should write a letter to the publisher why there are only fathers and sons in this book. There are as many mothers as fathers and as many daughters as sons out there. Why doesn't the female gender find consideration?
(Okay, not everyone appreciates this kind of humor.)
Back to my review...
The book has been published two weeks ago, but according to some comments it is unforgivable not to review a book immediately after reading. Sometimes a book flashes you and you simply want to enjoy it a little longer without talking about it. This is no such book.
In short:
To write a review
I'm in no mood.
All I can say is
the book wasn't good.
My first impression was: what did I just read? There wasn't a story - at all. I expected themes for children like going to bed, brushing teeth, little siblings, playing with friends, move to an other city. Something a little child can relate to. This book is not aimed at children. Instead the addressee of this book is a father (it says "your bench" and "your son" repeatedly). I don't think children need such a book. They don't think about color or race or other differences. As long as they have fun playing together everything is fine. It is the parents that say don't play with this child it's a different color or wearing a tutu as a boy isn't "normal" or manly.
The book claims to be for children when in fact it is written for parents especially fathers or parents-to-be. For me it is missing the mark concerning the audience.
Let's talk about the poems and the illustrations. I understand why it is written as a poem. Children like rhymes, but it has to be done in a good way. A poem is melodic and sometimes the voice sounds like singing not reading. This isn't the case here, it is written in a doggerel verse and sounds jolty. The illustrator does a great job in coming up with different situations and people, even though the poems don't add much to it. The style of the illustrations is not really my cup of tea, but that is just my personal taste.
What I have issues with is "the many ways that love can take shape and be expressed in a modern family". What is a modern family? A mother, a father and at least one child? Sounds very traditional to me. I know the book is about the relationship between father and son through a mother's eye. But not every child has such a family. There are different family concepts out there. The child of a divorced couple with two moms and two dads. The child of a homosexual couple with two moms or two dads. The child with only one mom or one dad because the other parent died. The child that lives with foster parents. While the book is inclusive and diverse in some parts, there are a lot of people left out.
All in all this book wasn't for me.
Apparently this book is about a father and his son and the endless possibilities in their relationship or the boy's development.
Harry and Meghan are the perfect role models for one possibility: you can always ditch your father. That makes me wonder what Archie will do in the future? 🤔
"Honi soit qui mal y pense."
This whole book has a hypocritical taste to it.
Side note:
For someone who quit the royal business Meghan uses her royal name quite prominent.