What do you think?
Rate this book


92 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1924
Generally, the prewar debates were divided into two camps. One side asserted the Golden Age puzzle formula of “whodunit” was the authentic (honkaku; 本格), healthy (kenzen; 健全), and modern/progressive format, as opposed to the allegedly inauthentic (henkaku; 変格) form of writing which was characterized by its grotesque taste, lack of scientificity/logic, and “backward” premodern references. The other side argued that detective fiction should be understood as artistic fiction with detective tastes (tantei shumi 探偵趣味) rather than scientific fiction with rigid rules. They stated that it is the fictional element, not the detective element, that is central to a detective story. – Historical Overview: Japanese Detective Fiction, All About RampoUnderstandably there was a cultural war going on, and not simply in literature, between a modern West and a premodern Japan. I think it’s fair to say that Japan has had a harder time than most letting go of its heritage than, say, the United States which hardly had one to begin with. (To be fair the States had its own problems at this time when it came to producing authentic American classical music.)
(This is a very brief summary of information gleaned from Satomi Saito’s thesis ‘Culture and authenticity: the discursive space of Japanese detective fiction and the formation of the national imaginary’ pages 71-80.)
I simply was not favourably impressed by this story. I found it somewhat odd to hear that others considered this an excellent work and recommended it for first place. Just in case, I read it a second time, but sure enough, my efforts were in vain. I do not see the goodness (yosa) of this work.I can see his problem and it’s a problem writers throughout the land were struggling with at the time: What makes a work of detective fiction a work of Japanese detective fiction? To start answering that consider what makes a work like Koji Suzuki's Ring different to, say, Stephen King’s Christine.