"This book is a darkly hilarious parade of freaks and monstrosities".
The sentence above is true. But it falls desperately short as a useful representation of this collection. As a sentence, it's not enough, at all.
I read it first when I was 14. I have read it again, and again, and again. There's nothing else like it. I can't say it's beautiful. Rather it has a kind of magnificent, shockingly clever ugliness similar to that which a very occasional piece of modern art manages to pull off well enough to genuinely make me think.
Here - try this:
After a while he said: "Tell me your last dream."
The emperor said: "I never dream."
"How many tribes do you rule?"
"I rule nations, not tribes. I rule forty-three nations."
The saint said sternly, "Among the perimeter people a ruler who does not dream is impossible. And a ruler who dreams badly is stoned to death. Will you go away and dream well?"
The emperor stared and said, "Is that the best you can say to me?"
"Yes."
The emperor pointed at the builder and said, "Roll that thing aside. Let me out."
"No. You have not answered my question. Will you go away and dream well?"
"I cannot command my dreams!"
"Then you cannot command yourself. And you dare to command other people?"
The saint took a cudgel from the shadows and beat the emperor hard for a long time.
That passage comes from a story that - read alone - is, as far as I'm concerned, worth all five of the stars I have given this book. And that passage in italics is only one tiny piece, at the beginning of this disgustingly-yet-deliciously cynical satire, which in this collection ordered into two chapters, (though presented as two different stories), separated in the collection's order by three other monumental satirical works, whose purpose are clearly to be sandwiched between the "start" and "end" of "The Axletree" - which are, respectively, the titles of these two chapters/stories. Because the meaning of the sandwiched three would be SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT if they weren't sandwiched by the other two.
The Axletree stories are a parable. Or a an allegory. Or a fable. Or... something. It's impossible to say what. It's all very strange and deliberate. Reading it doesn't feel like reading. It feels like looking at a sculpture. That's the only way I can describe it.
"It's impossible to say what" is a phrase that will trip of the tongue quickly if ever one is asked to describe what "genre" Alasdair Gray writes in. "Fantasy", I suppose, is the closest, but it's quite ridiculous to try and encourage people to read Gray as if he is a fantasy writer, it's like saying MC Escher was a naturalist because some of his pictures contained ducks.
There is a story in this collection about ducks. Some of the illustrations of these ducks (produced by Gray) always struck me as oddly Escheresque. But Escher has never made me laugh out loud like Gray's illustrations have.
This is my favourite short story collection. It contains my favourite short story "The Cause of Some Recent Changes" which is my favourite story because the typography itself becomes part of the
story. The illustration at the end of the story is of someone chiselling the story's last paragraph out of rock.
A lot is said in literary criticism about the "author's voice". Gray's prose is a lightning conductor for his mind. His mind was seemingly a very peculiar thing and it can be felt - hovering just behind and beyond each sentence in these stories - but it blazes through in flashes of lightning-hot genius.
His prose is sharp and cold and it glitters with nasty-but-delicious ironies. It doesn't seem to age -by which I mean it tickles me the same way every time I read it.
Everyone should read this. It does things with words that shouldn't be possible.