AN ANALYSIS OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS THAT ARE HARMFUL
Authors Stephen Arterburn and Jack Felton wrote in the Introduction to this 1991 book, “Media ministers are not the only ones who poison faith. Faith is tainted from many other sources… A business failure, a broken relationship, and the death of a wonderful friend are all common events that change the way some view God. The roots of bitterness and unresolved anger are allowed to poison their faith. Some turn away from God and never come back… others manifest their toxic faith in more obvious ways… they want to earn God’s love… [They] feel extreme guilt if they don’t sacrifice family, friends, and themselves in service of the church. Their faith is toxic, poisoned by an unfortunate trauma or a desire to work their way to heaven… There are still others whose toxic faith provides a means to avoid the realities of life. They expect God to work miracles at their beck and call… Those who possess a toxic faith have stepped across the line from a balanced perspective of God to an unbalanced faith in a weak, powerless or uncaring God… Most likely, you have dealt with at least one of these issues in your search for truth about life and the God who created it… I want to help you throw out that toxic faith and bring you back to the real thing.”
They explain, “Religious addicts are extremely intolerant of varying opinions or expressions of faith. Either walk their way or be out of step. Their rigidity rejects other believers rather than accepts them. They routinely judge others and find the negative in everyone else’s life. From a position of superiority, they put down others for what they believe and how they manifest their faith. They want to control the lives of others, especially their beliefs.” (Pg. 42)
Of ‘Biblical Exclusivity,’ they observe, “The battle between religion and psychology has been waged on this toxic belief for years. Many have nothing to do with anything relating to emotions unless it is in Scripture. Their train of thought goes like this: ‘If there is not a Scripture to back the idea, it must be harmful.’ This is close to the truth but not quite on the mark. True faith means that a person should not do anything that goes against something from God’s Word. It doesn’t mean that EVERY behavior or insight into life is going to be found there.” (Pg. 76-77)
They note, “If God was sending plagues to wipe people out, He would have wiped out millions of unfaithful spouses. Adultery is rampant, as are greed, lying cheating and thousands of other sins. The AIDS epidemic … is an opportunity for many believers to reach out to a group of people who have been alienated from God.” (Pg. 86)
They observe, “If something can be labeled as an addiction, our culture feels more hope for overcoming it because we know how to fight addiction. There are steps to fight addiction. God is part of addiction recovery… Groups of addicts band together to help one another with similar addictions. In our society, it seems that addiction problems are the ones to have because help and support are available, there is hope for change, and many other people have had a similar problem. Addiction has become a label that invites others to the point of recovery.” (Pg. 102-103)
They state, “Peace is found in activity… religious addicts find relief in work. However, what is labeled as peace is actually avoidance. The hard work is the enabler for avoidance. Essentially, they work so hard in an attempt to outrun the pain. Real people are lost and replaced with those who will assist in carrying out the charade. Business becomes the goal, and religious compulsivity provides for toxic believers a false presence of God.” (Pg. 119)
They point out, “When toxic faith comes under scrutiny, the religious addict reacts predictably: ‘I am accountable only to God.’ No one is accountable only to God. We are all accountable to the government. A married person is accountable to a spouse. Anyone asserting singular accountability to God either is not thinking clearly or has a terrible sin to hide…” (Pg. 184)
They say, “It is very difficult for religious compulsion to stand alone. Usually, a secondary compulsion reinforces the primary one and vice versa. One compulsion stands out for the world to observe. It is an ‘admirable’ compulsion, such as work or a hobby or religion. The other compulsion is usually a hidden one that few people (if any) would consider admirable.” (Pg. 210)
They summarize, “Toxic faith is all about addiction and victimization. Each person in his or her role becomes addicted to the type of power or security offered by that role. The longer the person is in the role, the more difficult it becomes to stop the addictive behavior unique to that role. The tragedy of the toxic faith system is that everyone is a victim.” (Pg. 239)
They conclude, “Toxic faith is based on ‘either/or,’ ‘black or white,’ ‘us versus them,’ and ‘all or nothing’ mentalities. It is so extreme that there is no room for compromise, no middle ground for others outside the system. Healthy faith accepts the fact that life is not black or white and allows the believer to feel okay about the struggle with the gray areas of life.” (Pg. 307)
While this book was written during the televangelist scandals of the ‘80s, it is still a perceptive analysis of the topic.