ARC provided by NetGalley in exchange for an honest review
Fun fact: when I first saw the synopsis for this book, I saw the name "Julius Caesar" and knew I had to read this - but not for the reasons one may expect. When I had first come across this book, I had just finished rereading If We Were Villains , aka one of my favourite books of all time, and so I was thinking about it non-stop - and since the play Julius Caesar was pretty significant in that book, I wanted to read this one.
Regardless of my pretty strange reasoning for wanting to read this, as someone who loves history, I was still pretty excited about this. A Coin for the Ferryman is about scientists, who have managed to make a time machine, enlisting the help of academics to achieve Phase 3 of their plan: to bring Julius Caesar into the present day (which for them is 1999) just before he is stabbed to death.
This seemed like a pretty solid plot to me, but when I actually read it, I wish the execution had been a bit more exciting. Our characters faced pretty much no challenges for over half of the book - so the first 50% of the novel was just them managing to accomplish literal time travel with no hiccups and a very vague and confusing explanation for how it even worked. There were also a lot of pages wasted with random backstories about how people met and that was kind of boring because I didn't even like most of the characters. Even when our characters started to face more obstacles, which took the form of rich people being their usual rich and morally bankrupt selves, it still wasn't all that suspenseful - regardless, I still found the last portion easy and entertaining enough to read quite quickly.
As aforementioned, I didn't like most of the characters - of our mains, Cassandra was the only tolerable one. Caesar was also quite interesting, but I do think that his actions were a little unrealistic given the circumstances. I also think he was under-utilised as a character - I wish we learnt more about him, and maybe spent more time with him in the present day. As for the other characters, I think they could have been more well-developed. One-dimensional or not, they were rude, stubborn, irritating and, despite being among the top of their fields, quite stupid. A lot of the issues that we did have to overcome in this book can be attributed to people not using their brains.
Similarly, in regard to the romantic relationships, the main two that were introduced were also extremely underdeveloped and came out of nowhere (one of them ended almost as quickly as it started, which made me wonder why it was even included in the first place). I honestly think that both of these relationships added nothing to the story - a bold statement, considering the "reveal" relevant to the relationship introduced later on the story, but I still think that making that particular relationship romantic in nature wasn't necessary. Both of the relationships had a significant age gap, which I did not like - this is just a personal preference, but the age gap trope in general tends to make me uncomfortable. I do think that the other relationships that weren't romantic in nature, specifically the ones that Cassandra had with her "mentor" figures, were done well.
Another issue I had with this book was that the characters were kind of sexist. We were constantly reminded - in every single chapter - how beautiful our main character, Cassandra, is. That in itself isn't necessarily problematic, it was just annoying - it was more of an issue because her beauty was often the thing remarked upon before anything else. For example, she was supposed to have been chosen to be a part of this time-travelling project because of her exceptional ability to speak Latin - and yet, her good looks were considered "almost as valuable as her language skills". Why?? They tried to say that Caesar would feel more comfortable because of her looks, but I don't think that THE Julius Caesar, one of the most renowned military figures in history, is going to be intimidated by a strange ugly girl any more than he would a pretty one. Even one of the female professors found it difficult to believe that a woman as beautiful as Cassandra could possibly be as fluent in Latin as others had claimed. The physical appearances of the female characters were almost always remarked upon, even when it wasn't even relevant. The way that the male characters viewed female characters in general also just didn't sit right with me. One female character was labelled as "emotionally damaged" after having an understandable reaction to something that was upsetting and, afterwards, her valid concerns were ignored because she was "ridiculous". Additionally, one male character remarked how impressive it was that Cassandra, a young woman, could drive a manual car. I realise that this book is set in 1999, but quite frankly, I don't care - the blatant misogyny wasn't necessary. Not even Caesar, who lived over 2 millennia ago, was as incessantly demeaning.
The book also needed a little bit of polishing with the actual writing. A lot of sentences didn't include all the necessary details to make sense. Sometimes, I would use the previous sentences to fill in the gaps, but it would turn out that these sentences were unrelated. I realise that this may be a personal comprehension issue, but what cannot be disputed is that there were some continuity errors. On three separate occasions, I noticed that it would say one thing initially, but it would say something completely different the next time. For example, it had originally said that a character had injured their left leg - but then it suddenly said it was their right leg. Although such mistakes don't greatly affect the plot, they were a little bothersome to read.
Overall, this was a flawed book, but it can still be enjoyable to read if you enjoy history.