[3.5]
oppositions is an essay collection spanning decades of mary gaitskill’s writing career. despite the range of topics explored - from political scandals, learning to ride a horse in your 50s, to a review of the best-selling thriller ‘gone girl’ - the collection somehow remains cohesive and subtle, with gaitskill’s intelligence shining throughout.
gaistkill’s work is definitely polarising, perhaps even provocative. some of the points she makes you will agree with, and some others you won’t, which is something that gaitskill herself regularly acknowledges. in an essay which discusses whether nabokov’s ‘lolita’ is about love, gaistkill muses on readers potentially throwing the book across the room. but whether you’re inclined to do this or not, her writing remains compelling enough to stick around to watch the thought processes fully form and work themselves out on the page. although the terms ‘nuanced’ and ‘complex’ may seem like easy and simple choices to describe a book, especially a non-fiction, they do serve as the best options in this case.
with a refusal to analyse her subjects through a strictly intellectual lens, gaitskill instead intersects her own personal experiences throughout, no matter the topic of the essay. she veers away from convenience, avoiding the simple, easy answers and holding everything up for inspection - whether that be other writers, celebrities, books, films, music, politics, even herself. gaitskill also focuses her critical eye on some more sensitive topics, for instance sexual assault is a prominent theme, which gaitskill discusses both in terms of her own experiences and also through unpacking her mixed thoughts on the #metoo movement (a subject which is explored further in her novella ‘this is pleasure’).
whether you do or don’t ‘agree’ with the takes and analyses in this collection isn’t really important, and, to me personally, doesn’t seem to be the end goal. instead, gaitskill’s writing encourages the reader to question things, to pause their initial responses, and to take some time to think critically.