The Intrusive State & How it’s hurting us: India’s Big Government by Vivek Kaul is an insightful book about the problems associated with the government’s policy making and implementation.
Too much of a good thing leads to disaster
Generally, the government tries to do too many things loosely rather than doing few things with focus. The book traces historical account of this big government post India’s independence. There is a general argument that post India’s independence the private companies would have neither the money nor the risk appetite in setting-up companies in sectors like steel with long gestation period, and therefore it’s the duty of the government to set-up such plants. But this pattern of setting-up public sector enterprise continued and got strengthened. The private sector was there, but it was held in check & controlled by industrial license and various other policies. The public sector through various public sector enterprises was the centerpiece of national policy.
The economic system and growth was driven through centrally planned Five Year Plans for the country. The structures were built on socialist pattern that the government running businesses would ensure that Indians could control their own well-being.
When the first five-year plan was launched in the year 1951, there were just five public sector enterprises. The socialistic instincts of the government further increased with the nationalization of banks during 1960s. By 1985, the number of public sector enterprises went to around 200. The public sector enterprises intruded even consumer oriented sectors textiles, bread, newsprint, paper, footwear as well as drugs, hotels etc. The government even started nationalizing & taking over sick private companies in order to ensure that jobs were not lost (Cotton Mills, National Bicycle Corporation of India).
“The larger point being that the Indian government is present in many areas where we do not need it but absent in those areas where we do really need it.”
There was virtually no space for entrepreneurship, risk taking and innovation that drives economic progress. It resulted into slow economic growth for many decades commonly referred as Hindu rate of growth. It averaged around 3.5 % between 1950 and 1980. This was the time when South East Asian countries were growing at 8 to 15 %, or even more.
The government ventured into managing profit making business whereas the bureaucratic system that India inherited from the British continued was not meant for management of profit making enterprises. The system was meant for administration and enforcement of laws, rules and regulations.
Economic Reforms of 1991
The economic reforms of 1991 (LPG Labialization, Privatization & Globalization) resulted into unleashing the entrepreneurial instinct of private sector, and things started changing. The private sector was allowed into many sectors it was not previously allowed. Most of the public sector enterprises were not able to compete with the private players, the share of public sector enterprises started declining. The private sector in the field of telecom services, running airlines, ports, banking resulted into substantial improvement. The government kept on bailing out loss incurring public sector enterprises, and in sectors where the private sector has been allowed entry, it has flourished, and the government companies have had to take a back seat.
“We have invested over one lakh crore of rupees in the public sector so far. The returns therefrom, on the whole, have been very meagre. All this is the people’s money, no one else’s. The present situation is that the Government can no longer collect any more money from the people for further fresh investment in the public sector.” P V Narasimha Rao, the than Prime Minister at the 79th Congress Plenary at Tirupati in 1992.
The big problems in the economic strategy of India was that if state continued funding loss incurring public sector enterprises, it took away money from other important sectors, like education, health, infrastructure, etc.
There is somewhat misplaced impression that the size of the government i.e. the number of people it employs is too big. But the actual problem is that it is big in the number of things it tries to do, and hence, in the process, it messes up other important things.
The programs designed with high on intent and ambition but not taking into account the limited implementation capability of the government will fail. The limited implementation capability of the government needs to be taken into account while designing any policy, program.
“The trouble is that very few states have the administrative capacity to implement the 200 plus schemes sponsored by the central government. Implementing a scheme essentially means assessing the grants, spending the money as per the stipulated conditions, maintaining separate accounts and then submitting reports to the central government. In fact, this capacity is even lower in states which actually need these schemes the most.”
Minimum Government, Maximum Governance
Do not try to take over the markets, let the market function competitively.
In order to benefit from India’s demographic dividend, Big Government in many areas needs to go. The implementation of Minimum Government, Maximum Governance policy will result into significant boosting of the economy and India’s GDP.
The Intrusive State & How it’s hurting us: India’s Big Government by Vivek Kaul is insightful and very useful book for anyone interested or working in the field of public policy. The book is written in a very simple language with very few jargons or technical terms.