Were we to evaluate people, not only according to their intelligence and their education, their occupation and their power, but according to their kindliness and their courage, their imagination and their sensitivity, their sympathy and their generosity, there could be no classes. Who would be able to say the scientist was superior to the porter with admirable qualities as a father, the civil servant with unusual skill at gaining prizes to the lorry driver with unusual skill at growing roses?
I try to do something similar when I rate a book, not necessarily for any objective quality of its subject or style, but for the emotional journey I shared with its characters and its generosity of ideas and imagery. I have always enjoyed the company of Nick Hornby, his humour and his pop culture references (sport, music, movies), even as I sometimes dismissed his work as light entertainment – a sort of modern P G Wodehouse who is guaranteed to put a smile on my face and reconcile me with some of the most thorny issues of modern living. His latest novel shows more engagement with the world at large and a more mature attitude towards relationships.
It was a time when everyone was vowing never to forgive people. Politicians were never going to be forgiven for what they have done, friends and family were never going to be forgiven for the way they have voted, for what they have said, maybe even for what they thought. Most of the time, people were not being forgiven for being themselves.
While on the surface Just Like You is a romantic novel about two unlikely people falling in love and dealing with the inevitable ‘bumps’ along the road to happiness, the liaison between Lucy and Joseph unfolds against the backdrop of political and social upheaval, mostly from the Brexit referendum and its aftermath, with a dash of Trumpism thrown in towards the end. It is a novel that explores the distance between expectations and pragmatism, between white collar and blue collar, between a middle aged divorced woman who likes her teaching career and a twenty-something young man who juggles two low paying jobs while dreaming to become a musician, between a liberal white intellectual who loves books and witty conversations and a black youth who likes football, clubbing and socializing on his mobile phone.
“Lucy, friend of Natasha’s, two boys, Dylan and Al, ten and eight, very, very involved in their lives, probably more than I want to be, no longer with their dad.”
Pressured by her loud, obnoxious friend Emma, Lucy finally agrees to go out dating after a painful separation from her alcoholic, drug-addicted husband. Right from the start, I loved Lucy [no connection I believe to the classic sitcom]. She has a non-nonsense approach to matters of the heart that acknowledges the difficulties of getting back in the game and the low probability of finding Mr. Right over a couple of cocktails in a downtown bar.
Imagine that this unlikely man loved fresh flowers and the films of Asghar Farhadi, that he preferred cities to the countryside, that he read fiction – proper fiction, not novels about terrorists and submarines – that, yes, he enjoyed both giving and receiving oral sex, that he was kind to her sons, that he was tall, dark, handsome, solvent, funny, clever, liberal, stimulating.
Lucy has a pretty clear idea of what she would like in her love life, but she is enough of a realist to whittle down the wishlist to a couple of basic requirements, ‘proper hygiene’ coming top of the page. She also has a great sense of humour, equally directed at her conversation partners and at her own occasional recklessness.
‘cut to the chase’ - she had googled it, and she now knew that it came from the early days of cinema, and meant more or less exactly what it said: get to the exciting part as quickly as possible. Hal Roach, the man thought to have coined the phrase, probably never imagined it would be used to describe the moment in a meal where two divorced people talked about their disappointment and oversensitivity.
You really can’t get involved with someone out of pity or out of boredom. Lucy would rather spend her evenings with a good book, but the heart has a way of ignoring direct signals from the brain, and eventually makes landfall on the nice young man who serves Lucy choice cuts at the butcher every Saturday. Joseph is equally smitten with the pretty lady with the nice eyes, even as he wonders whether she would consider him too young to notice.
All things being equal, the eyes usually swung it, and not just because it was the eyes that made the face beautiful. The eyes were everything – they contained the first indication of whether someone was smart, kind, funny, hungry in all the right ways as well as some of the interesting wrong ones.
One thing lead to another, and from discussing the weekend menu they go to a babysitting arrangement, then to secret rendez-vous, to Joseph moving in, to making their relationship public, breaking up, getting back together or maybe calling the whole thing off, or maybe accepting that they are made for each other.
Maybe that was it, Lucy thought. Maybe there was only wondering about wondering, which had to be as good a definition of self-consciousness as any.
Self-awareness is probably the one thing Lucy and Joseph share, the one quality that makes up for all the things that claim they shouldn’t be together. Self-doubt and the ability to see the world through the other person’s eyes are in fact the only way the two lovers, and society in general, can get over these divisive times. Nick Hornby lays his story down like the proverbial bridge over troubled waters, tackling thorny, polarizing issues of the world we have to deal with today: Brexit intransigence ( How would Shakespeare have voted? She supposed it depended on how old he was at the time of the referendum. ) , pervasive propaganda, racism, income inequality, cultural desolation ( “Didn’t you bring anything to read?” “My phone.” , job satisfaction, family interactions, age, and so on. Together, Lucy and Joseph are engaged in something similar to a ‘hurdles’ race , with each obstacle overcome only paving the way for the next one around the bend.
“Everyone I know is miserable. Everyone. Except you, apparently, Lucy. That’s why we’re here. We want to know why you’re not miserable.”
“We need a master class.”
“Give us hope.”
Success is not guaranteed, not even in the final few pages of the story. Instead of a happy ending, peace of mind and knowing you gave it your best shot, with honesty and kindness and an open mind, might be all we can hope for.