First, my thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for providing an ARC in exchange for this independent review.
I hadn’t read a Robin Cook novel in a very long time. But I remembered enjoying Coma and so thought to give this a try. I’m sorry to have to say this is one of the worst books I’ve read this year.
Melodramatic and thoroughly contrived, “Viral” seems intended not to tell a good story, but to cast the medical and insurance industries in the worst possible light in order to drive home the author’s plea—stated right up front in the dedication—that Congress enact “at the very minimum, a public health option.”
Brian Murphy, his wife Emma, and their four-year-old daughter are vacationing on Cape Cod when a mosquito bites Emma, and she contracts encephalitis and requires hospitalization. The former NYPD husband and wife have just begun their own security business, foundering in the midst of COVID, and the insurance company they chose to fit their meager budget has refused to pay any of the $200,000 in medical expenses. Things go from bad to worse for the Murphy family until Brian decides to retaliate.
The plot is entirely predictable. Most readers, movie-goers, and television watchers will be able to tell what’s going to happen 10-20 pages before it actually does. And it’s filled with the pedantic and mundane. Whole passages are devoted to describing the minutiae of parking at the beach, preparing for a picnic, a bicycle ride to get pastries, packing the family car, and the decision tree on an insurance company’s telephone system.
The characters are thinly drawn and entirely stereotypical, which means it’s tough to care about them. It doesn’t help that the dialogue is wooden and not realistic and that descriptions of characters’ thoughts, feelings, and reactions are, in many cases, not credible. Time and time again, I found myself thinking: people just don’t talk or react this way. As just one example, after learning he’s just been thrown into collections by the hospital, Brian receives another $30,000 worth of bills from other providers. His reaction is to “muse” and “wonder” about how financially predatory hospitals have become and how “complicit” the well-insured have been in this “tolerated fraud.” Is that a realistic reaction or simply the author telling us what he thinks about healthcare and insurance?
And “Viral” is so poorly written. It’s filled with exposition, long digressions into backstory, repetitiveness, wordiness, poor word choices, a heavy overuse of descriptive adjectives and adverbs--always s a bad sign—and more than a few grammatical errors. One wonders whether any kind of editor ever reviewed this.
On the positive side, “Viral” does seem to contain some information based on medical/ scientific research that needs to be taken seriously, especially about mosquito-borne illnesses and their effects. But that’s not enough to rescue this very bad novel. I had been hoping for a decent entertainment—indeed the “electrifying medical thriller” promised by the novel’s blurb. What I got was a political screed thinly disguised as fiction.