So. The right-wing populists who warned everyone that mass migration from Muslim countries into Europe would result in a culture clash and an increase in violent crime have been proven right. Well, that's awkward.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who is herself an immigrant from a Muslim country, went to great lengths to dig up the truth about the impact of the migration crisis on European women. I have a lot of respect for Hirsi Ali; she is a person with integrity who doesn't let anyone's political agenda get in the way of talking about a problem and offering practical solutions. She and her research team traveled to the European countries that had taken in the largest numbers of migrants: Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Sweden (as well as some others whose influx of refugees was large relative to the population of the country).
Men of all nationalities, ethnicities, and religions harass and abuse women. We all know that. People are uncomfortable bringing up nationality, ethnicity, and religion when the perpetrator of violence is from a racial or religious minority because they feel like they are singling out a characteristic about someone that should not matter, and to some degree I understand that. There are racists who seize on any instance of nonwhite male misbehaviour to promote racist opinions, and well-meaning people don't want to give them ammunition. But the left-wing has the opposite problem: they only care about male violence when it can be pinned on "straight white men." Race and ethnicity aren't related to a man's propensity for violence, but the ideologies he holds are. The majority of migrants who have traveled to Europe are young men. Migrant Muslim men primarily from the Middle East and North Africa target both women from their own communities who are "immodest" or "act too Western" and Western women because they are "sluts" and leftists pretend they don't see it. Questioning whether their behaviour has something to do with their religion or cultural values makes Muslim men look bad. It's a real issue that people don't want to talk about, and that's why Hirsi Ali wrote this book.
Hirsi Ali remarks on how troubling it is that in the era of the #MeToo movement, when Western societies have finally started to take sexual violence and sexual harassment against women and girls more seriously, the poor and lower class women and girls most affected by the sex crimes in Europe's "no-go zones" don't receive nearly as much attention or sympathy as Hollywood actresses who were harassed by producers. Indeed, the amount of Muslim male violence against women and girls that has been excused, ignored, or covered up by the police, law courts, media, and the general public due to fear of being called "racist" or "xenophobic" should enrage anyone who reads this book. It certainly enraged me.
- Hirsi Ali begins the book by describing how women are slowly disappearing from public life in certain streets and neighbourhoods due to the degree of sexual harassment and assault they have endured walking through them. In some areas of London, Paris, and Stockholm where the sexes once mingled, women are no longer anywhere to be seen.
- It was a big challenge for Hirsi Ali and her assistants to find information about migrants and sex crimes. Most European countries do not record the migration status, ethnicity, or religion of the perpetrators in crime statistics. The ones that do tend to be reluctant to release the information. In 2015, for example, Sweden's minister of justice refused to release data that included the migration status of criminals despite public pressure to do so. Sweden has no problem releasing data about the migration status of victims of crimes, however. One Swedish newspaper took it upon themselves to do some research on their own: looking through 58 gang rape cases in Sweden between 2012 and 2017, they found that of the 112 convicted rapists, 75% were not born in Sweden and 41% of that percentage were asylum seekers. A Swedish documentary on sex crimes during that same period found that 58% of offenders were born outside Sweden. "Of 129 convicted for assault rape, 110 were foreign-born. Of 94 gang rapists, 70 were born outside Europe." (Dömda för våldtäkt, SVT Nyheter)
- "Austria's Federal Ministry of the Interior does publish the migration status of suspects in its crime statistics. Since 2009, sex offenses increased by 11.8 percent. Of the 936 rape cases reported in 2018, more than half of the suspects (55 percent) were not Austrian citizens. In 2017, asylum seekers were suspects in 11 percent of all reported rapes and sexual harassment cases in Austria, despite making up less than 1 percent of the total population. The more general category of "foreigners"—which includes other non-Austrian citizens, who make up around 19 percent of Austria's population—were suspects in almost a third of rape and sexual harassment cases."
- In the other countries that recorded whether criminal suspects were native, foreign, or born to foreign parents, there were similar patterns. In Denmark, statistics show that "non-Western" immigrants and their children accounted for about 40% of rape convictions and between 25% and 33% of groping convictions despite making up less than 13% of the population. In France, foreigners make up 7% of the population but are suspects in 14% of sex crimes. In Germany, asylum seekers make up 1 to 2% of the population but were almost 12% of suspects in sex crimes in 2018 (16.3% for rapes specifically). Hirsi Ali also sought out regional data in Bavaria and Lower Saxony, which received some of the highest numbers of asylum seekers, and found that the numbers showed the same picture.
- I'm glad Hirsi Ali touched on why media outlets have been claiming the exact opposite of what the real data shows, because for the past six years all I've been hearing is that migrants almost never commit crimes and that suggesting that the increase in crime in Europe has anything to do with mass migration from the Muslim world is just racist xenophobic propaganda designed to make you hate migrants. Until sometime last year, before I started investigating this topic more deeply, I believed that most migrants really were integrating well and that it was rare for them to commit crimes. I was so naïve. Anyway the studies that supposedly prove that migrants have not contributed to the increase in European crime rates are sorely lacking. They rely on outdated data, such as one study Hirsi Ali described which only covered crime statistics from 2014 to 2015. The migration crisis began in late 2015 and violent crime spiked in 2017 and 2018, she explains, and none of that data was available to report on even during the years that it happened. It can take a couple of years for governments to collect and process all that data before they can publish it. (From my experience, they also rely on improper methods, like getting survey participants to say that they still feel safe walking through their cities, like one article I remember reading in which the journalist who did such a survey looked at the results and triumphantly reported, "See, 59% of people say they feel safe!" But that leaves 41% of people who don't feel safe...and 41% is still a pretty large percentage! That's about 2 out of every 5 people.)
- The book goes on to discuss numerous cases of sexual violence, many of which were handled horribly by the police and law courts. In these cases migrant men convicted of rape and abuse, including the sexual abuse of children, were handed painfully light sentences such as 150 hours of community service, three weeks in prison, and paying a fine to their victims. The Cologne attacks on New Year's Eve of 2015, during which 1,500 migrant men engaged in mass sexual assaults of women while police did nothing to stop them, later resulted in only three convictions. Hirsi Ali also devotes a chapter to the infamous grooming gangs in Britain, made up primarily of Pakistani men, which the police chose not to investigate because they were afraid of "inciting racial tensions." What I did not know is that it was not just Rotherham, but many other cities, where the rapes and sexual abuses of young girls by such gangs took place, and are still taking place. Some of the rapists have only recently been convicted even though the gang abuses have been going on for more than a decade. It's no wonder many migrant men have no fear of the law when their host country practically rewards them for raping little girls.
- "What is lost on many in the debate about integration is that the individual's relationship with the government is vastly different in the undemocratic societies the immigrants are fleeing. [...] People do not take their problems to the authorities as citizens do in Europe. If they agitate or criticize the government, they can end up in prison or dead. In such countries everyone has a story of a relative or friend who has "disappeared" at the hands of authorities.
For a new arrival, being stopped by a European policeman or policewoman is a disconcertingly tame experience. A caution followed by a letter with a warning is no big deal to someone who in his home country would expect to be beaten or immediately thrown into prison."
- Pro-refugee European citizens who believe migrants are unfairly discriminated against whenever the government decides to deport them take part in some mind-blowing stupidity, such as the following:
"In August 2018, a Somali refugee, Yaqub Ahmed, was escorted onto a Turkish Airlines flight at London's Heathrow Airport to be repatriated to Somalia. He didn't get very far. The pilot refused to take off when passengers loudly protested his deportation. "Take him off the plane!" they chanted—which was exactly what the security personnel did. What the passengers did not know was that Ahmed was being deported as part of his conviction for gang-raping a 16-year-old girl with three of his friends. Before his abortive deportation, he had served four years of a nine-year prison sentence. Shortly after his release, one of his fellow rapists traveled to Syria to fight for the Islamic State."
- The chapter "Why Integration Has Not Happened" is crucial to understanding why Muslim children do worse in school than their non-Muslim peers, why more than half of refugee women in Europe are unemployed, why many migrants are still on welfare, and why "parallel societies" are failing Muslim women and girls.
"It is Muslim women who have the most to gain by integrating in the West, and their husbands and fathers know this. Muslim girls see the freedom and opportunities of their Western counterparts, but when they try to enjoy the same, they are pulled back. Indeed, the process of migration itself causes some men from honor cultures to crack down more severely in the European diaspora than in their country of origin. They forbid their girls to date and have boyfriends or even boys who are friends. They fear rumors and gossip that might tarnish their family's honor. Girls are discouraged from swimming, going to concerts, and participating in leisure activities where boys are present. They are not permitted to wear makeup and Western clothes. A 2016 survey of 1,100 young people aged between 12 and 18 years in Stockholm suburbs found that 56 percent of girls were not allowed to take part in recreational activities with boys."
- The failure of integration has been devastating for women and girls in Muslim communities. Hirsi Ali discusses the problem of domestic violence, honor killings, and forced marriages in Muslim communities that European authorities overlook due to a desire to "respect other cultures" and not be accused of "racism" or "xenophobia." Are you seeing a pattern yet? Muslim apologists love to conflate criticism of Islam with an attack on their ethnic identity; they do it deliberately and stupid people keep falling for it.
Western countries' cowardly and embarrassing capitulation to Islam is setting women's rights back, and people have suffered damage to their careers and reputations for daring to talk about it. I hope this is starting to change, and that European governments heed Hirsi Ali's warning and advice. I love that she offers some solutions, which includes rewriting laws about how the international community should handle refugees. She suggests that countries should accept migrants based on whether they are willing to adopt Western values rather than whether they claim to be asylum seekers, which is such a great idea. It would be better for an "economic migrant" whose life isn't in danger to be accepted because he or she believes in human rights and democracy than for an asylum seeker who has experienced persecution in his own country to be accepted when he hates women, hates the West, and probably has a long history of being an abusive piece of shit. He can fuck off back to his country and die. I don't understand why these types of people don't just migrate to other Muslim countries if they hate the West so much. I disagree with Hirsi Ali on some things; for instance I think European governments should absolutely put in more resources to deport migrants with criminal histories and migrants who contribute nothing to the country. The smartest thing to do would be to end Muslim immigration and only accept non-Muslim immigrants. It's working out for Poland. I have a lot more to say about this topic, but this is supposed to be a book review, so I'll just end it here.