It's hard to write a review of this book without tipping into a judgment on Huma Abedin's life and how she's chosen to present it. The shadow of Anthony Weiner hangs over the entire book leading up to the time of their meeting--I'd be caught up in the story and Abedin's many accomplishments, remember what was coming, and just be filled with a sense of dread.
The first half of the book starts before her existence, with her convincingly telling the reader about how interesting and accomplished her parents and grandparents are/were--ahead of their time feminist intellectuals, living in an exciting era of change in India and Pakistan. This ultimately segues into her own international childhood in Saudi Arabia, where her parents were both professors. Imo, this is one of the strongest parts of the books.
Things transition to the primary section of the book as she goes to college in the US and begins a White House internship. At one point, she leaves a family wedding early for a work trip, full of excitement, but with perspective now that this was a turning point: from here on out, she basically missed out on being an intimate member of her own family or really having any personal life at all. She outright questions--was it worth it?
At this point, the book becomes a haze of 18 hour days and Hillary Clinton fangirling (I'm mostly pro-Hillary, ftr), told almost like a CV. We went here, did this, did that, HRC gave a brilliant, impactful speech, I debased myself in various ways to help her achieve this, let me talk about how Nelson Mandela only saw me and HRC, because he was only seeing familiar people. I dunno. It's all impressive, she worked hard, and she should be proud. But something about all the namedropping comes across as insecure or even defensive at times. This covers Clinton's time as First Lady, senator, Secretary of State, and her presidential campaigns.
At some point around there, Abedin meets Weiner. Previously, she had briefly touched on dating to say that her Muslim faith (uninterested in casual dating or sex), accurate perception of her as someone with "wife" vibes, and, oh, working and traveling literally all of her waking hours had basically kept her from doing more than having a mutual crush once in college. In some ways, she conveys well his appeal: many gestures (Abedin doesn't drink, and Weiner immediately stopped once he realized this), charisma (both with constituents and women--she repeatedly says she felt lucky to have him interested in her), and both deeply invested in their political jobs. In other ways, I felt at a loss--they seemed to barely see each other and never really dated in any sense that I would recognize it, like hanging out at home together. The engagement almost comes out of nowhere, and she openly acknowledges ambivalence about it--she's worried about their mixed faiths (Weiner is Jewish; her family also shares this worry), but also believes that Weiner does care about her, and, in her mid-thirties, isn't sure she'll have a chance for marriage/children after this, considering, again, she's never dated before. She strongly implies that she was a virgin on their wedding night.
Here, we have a brief interlude of romance, early marriage, and pregnancy, which is almost immediately brought down, repeatedly, by Weiner's online extramarital dalliances. While Weiner is CLEARLY, 100% at fault for this, Abedin's actions around this time are also not entirely sympathetic. While they separate in the sense of not having a romantic or sexual relationship and intend to divorce, they continue to live together while Weiner cares for their son, because Abedin is still constantly travelling and working crazy hours for HRC's presidential campaign--she states that she doesn't have time to get divorced and also cites financial issues. Under those circumstances, while Weiner's contact with a minor and lack of boundaries with his son is reprehensible, I'm not exactly sure that sexting constitutes cheating. I believe that as of late 2021, they're STILL not divorced.
The "financial issues" are also off-putting. Abedin states that they used more or less her entire savings on their wedding (!), they then move to an apartment in Manhattan, basically as a way of distancing themselves from Weiner's old apartment and her need to have some direction in the situation, but which they can barely afford, and, while Weiner is initially able to get some consulting work, he's ultimately more or less unemployable. HOWEVER, while this is not referenced in the book, their 2012 household income was $490,000. So, either they're both very irresponsible with money, or this presentation of the facts is rather disingenuous.
This time period, with her and her family being tracked through NYC by paparazzi, HRC's email scandals bubbling over to the Abedin/Wiener abode, and visits from DFCS, is genuinely rough. Basically, all of this constant work on Abedin's part for almost 20 years is being challenged. Luckily, she's able to go back to some name-dropping, i.e. her bestie Anna Wintour and Oscar de la Renta, who designed her wedding dress as a favor. Barack Obama comforts her. She's talented enough to make the situation sympathetic and relatable, but then the faux money issues and fancy friends form this disconnect. I also think she's trying to show how many powerful people are on her side, but is it really great to have various politicians pity your marital situation?
There's an obvious, terrible symmetry in HRC being Abedin's idol, and both of them being intelligent, gifted women, who marry men that are in many ways their downfall. Abedin dances around her own relationship to Bill Clinton (who married her and Weiner, rather a harbinger of what was to come) and his own cheating scandals.
At this point in the story--the end--as other readers have wondered, what's next for Abedin? HRC has wound down her work at this point, and presumably Abedin can't continue with that forever. She's never sought any political office of her own. She's somehow still married to Anthony Weiner. The question now re-emerges from that earlier chapter--was it all worth it? She asserts that it was, but I can't say that I agree.