I spent an entire afternoon reading the short stories in this book, enthralled and enraptured, skipping "luncheon" to bathe in the hedonistic tendencies of Chopin's women. I am now tempted to spent all of my student loans in some tailor's shop, a fine restaurant, a play. I am tempted to sleep with the neighbor and call it infidelity, though I'm not bound to any man. And mostly, because of this, I am happy to be free and alone, to have my options open in modern day life, to follow my thoughts and no one else's, to have no responsibility designated to anyone. To fulfill my passions without approval, to work, to read and learn and spend money on no one but me. Selfish? Yes. But, living in the American south, why not be selfish? Everyone else seems to suffer under the weight of providing for more than one. Content alone, and materialistic by nature, Kate Chopin's work makes me happy. And that's all the women in this work want, really. But it doesn't stop at so mindless a conclusion. Her work deals with racism, inferiority, the suffering of women, the controlling and lesser minds of certain men who put themselves on a high horse, plain and dull, courting women of beauty. She deals with independence. The fulfillment of the woman. By any means she, and no one else, deems fit.
*This review excludes The Awakening, which I will read sometime soon. For now, I'll review a couple of choice short stories.
“Desiree’s Baby” by Kate Chopin
Though Armand’s courting was swift and defined by a blind romantic prospect, the miscegenation triggers a wave of racism, a trait hoarded by the antebellum south’s white population. While it is overwhelmingly about race, there are tones of sexism dispersed throughout the work. Desiree, while housed by loving parents, is a typical childrearer when it comes to her relationship. Though not necessarily unexpected in the 1800s, the treatment she receives when eschewed from the home is packaged with the typical “mother’s duty.” She takes the child, now purged by its father for its skin tone, and she does not gather any possessions. Like some primordial mother, she’s forced from her own home without her own belongings, holding her only creation while his land metaphorically rips from her what little she has left on her own back. It begins with a dreamy outlook of motherhood and turns into a drudging responsibility. She is weighed down by a forced-upon inferiority complex that she believes in not because of her nature, but because of his designation of said nature. The twist at the end, a zenith of irony in literature, deems him partially African-American as well, but the wording—“I thank the good God for having so arranged our lives that our dear Armand will never know that his mother, who adores him, belongs to the race that is cursed with the brand of slavery”—implies that purging Desiree of her home is equal, in a sense, to purging his own mother, who also gave birth to a “quadroon,” a one-quarter African-American by descent. Familial ties are ruptured on the basest level, but also on a level of maternal guilt.
“At the Cadian Ball” by Kate Chopin
A predecessor to “The Storm,” the work seems to focus on transitory relationships that might have grown into something more befitting and fulfilling. However, they’re both stunted by the emotions and regulations of a culture. Because the ball is one of suitors and dames, there’s a finality to the relationships in place, and Calixta feels obligated to finish her time in the single life, regardless of who it might be with. Although Alcee is best-suited, his departure (a hoax) seems to indicate a permanent loss of what was blooming, turning into what Alcee sees as “a myth.” She goes away with a plain-faced and dull man that she has no real interest in, but rather settles for. Meanwhile, he is swayed by the confession of love from Clarisse. Never would he have gone with her if not for the extreme call of an emergency, a lie, indicative of her melodrama and desperation. It ruptures what might have been, and comments on the culture’s prospect of dating and marriage—limited dating, permanent devotion. Though it may result in a loveless marriage, she doesn’t care, as long as she’s adhering to southern culture.
“The Storm” by Kate Chopin
Chopin continues to take on heavy subject matter, especially for the time period, and the illicit sex is taboo even today. Adultery is a sin to theists, and theists dominated the literate bunch in the American south. However, she bravely writes about a lack of consequence due to this risqué happening. Calixta and Alcee, from the prior work, are ushered in the same house during a storm and their past tension from the ball culminates finally, six years after meeting. Meanwhile, their respective spouses take shelter—Bobinôt in a store as he buys his wife a gift of canned shrimp, and Clarisse in a town, unaware of the storm. They screw, they feel no guilt for having these feelings and the blissful unawareness of their spouses is indeed blissful. Perhaps if Alcee and Calixta had married those years ago, the passion would have long dwindled, as it has between him and Clarisse, who is relieved to get his letter saying she may stay away longer if it so pleases her. And it does. They’re all peaceful, and it’s a commentary on how the taboo of society does not always hurt—it may even gain for some individuals. Which kind of makes the word “taboo” null.
“A Pair of Silk Stockings” by Kate Chopin
While it may be pondered by early critics that the work is one of empty materialism, the silk stockings a metaphoric “serpent of Eden,” I think the work is a deserved indulgence of the modern woman at the time. Mrs. Sommers, having come across $15, initially plans to take the responsible route and spend it on her children, borne with a man who she’d never dreamed of being with in her youth. She’d been taken from her previous wealth and thrust into a life of motherhood in which her own joy was sapped for the duties expected of her. A day of indulgence is not a blasé, glamorous escapade, but also a brilliant display of a woman’s guilt in the time period for doing something she’d enjoy. She doesn’t strip herself bare to feed her children but she doesn’t starve them either, she cares for them, as mediocre as it may be. But the hedonistic tendencies of the individual is a subject I particularly like, the meaning of self-satisfaction and the attitude of women bravely engorging alone, shopping alone, pampering themselves alone. There is no sentiment from a man that she’d fall to her knees to appreciate in the work—it all comes from her. It’s a brave and particularly enjoyable work of greed and feminism. It is her money. Not her husband’s, not her children’s. And though moral responsibility has designated it being spent on them, the overtaking self-pampering usually unseen by the audience as a good thing prevails over those demands.
“The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin
Cheering at the funeral procession and giggling in the wake of death is a crime due with the punishment only karma can pay. But is Louise Mallard so wrong for celebrating the death of a shackling life? Chopin studies the nature of the woman who must suffer under the wings of a usually nondescript man, not necessarily abused but subdued, and her study of women is unconventional for the time. They indulge—they’re all hedonists. They’re nowhere near angels, but they don’t want to be. They care, sometimes, to please people, but more importantly, they aim to please themselves. And who can argue against happiness? No, they don’t hurt anyone, but they certainly don’t care for people getting hurt. In this case, Louise is more than ready to embrace her husband’s death. Even the weather reflects her joy of warm, sunny days to come. Her abrupt sob is not genuine. There is no shock. When you’re told of death, the disingenuous and trained part of you says to cry. The natural part of you denies it. She swallows this claim with haste, springing up at the prospect of it. Of course, this cannot go. Denoting that women cannot survive without men might not have been Kate Chopin’s intention, but the implication is there. Perhaps it’s written that way to sell to audiences—this woman celebrating death is bad, isn’t that right, fellow moral readers? But her enjoyment strikes her so hard that her body cannot function anymore. A woman has not lived with such joy in her heart—a woman is not trained to endure such a pleasure.