I'm sure there are readers who will fall in love with this story, mainly if they like their classic fantasy world spiced up by a real life mythology that is not that common. The world is primeval: wild, full of magic, real gods and mythical beings that are rooten in real slavic mythologies and folklore. I loved the concept of szeptuchy and the channeling.
That said, the story felt really middle grade to me, and idk if it should have?
It's not the book's fault, really, it's mine. I was too excited to get my hands on something truly slavic (I'm glaring at you, grisha trilogy), but I had my hopes up too high.
The story is taking place in this unspecified time, but there are mentions of longhouses, tribes, tunics and they have a pantheon of slavic gods, which seems like the time before the Christianization. And that is already not really my cup of tea. I hoped it would be something inspired by a later period. Just a preference.
Another thing is that the story failed to grab me right from the prologue. I don't even know these characters and there is already something dramatic happening, and I simply don't care. Why should I?
From the chapter one a plot is nowhere in sight, and every other sentence is an exposition. It felt like a slice of life genre, everything was so slow. The drowning of Marzanna took chapters upon chapters. I got very sick of names of the gods popping up 10x per page. I love worldbuilding, alright? But there was no end to this, it did not leave me rest or process things.
Characters were predictable and not really captivating. They lacked depth. Waclaw is alright, but not really memorable or interesting protagonist, I had to question why was he the POV character. Or why was he chosen. His life does not seems that hard, the "half-chief" insult does not seem insulting enough for me to pity him. His wants and motivations are not really established, so when he does that stupid decision in the beggining and ends up with a bleeding hand, I don't really see why, he just seems stupid.
Otylia is sadly "not like other girls" while being a special snowflake, looking down on people in the village, enjoying making them fear her, full of angst since her mother died, always snapping and being contrary. Not very likeable(and her origin makes her even more obnoxious).
The bad part was that since very early on, there were visions of future romance, and it felt really forced and unnecessary. Why include spoilers? Who wants to root for something that we've already seen? And if they really are endgame, it's very boring. Their bond was not established very well, but years later they are not really talking and I just... wish the romance was not involved. Let them rekindle their friendship, but childhood friends-to-lovers? Please don't.
The whole society is of course misoginistic, another minus point for me. And of course it's the girl in the end that will need to be saved.
It did not sit well with me how Otylia's friend Ara was described, and that the danger they've seen in the vision was full of stereotypes about "savage nomads" from steppes, whom are dark skinned, good with horses and bows, but do not wear armor for some reason??
And then you have the horde and if you would question even now if they are actually bad: they are riding black horses, use bones as weapons, are smiling while killing people and are taking scalps. Got it? Yikes. I really hate the use of word cultists.
It's also sad that Marzanna and death/winter is painted as evil (idigenous slavic beliefs were anything but black and white), together with the "riders from the east". It stinks of yellow peril, and idk why the antagonists could not have been inspired by vikings, franks, goths, or you know, christian crusaders???
Maybe it's bc I've read so many books, that a story like this one seems so predictable and full of cliches. People like tropes, but I would also like to be sometimes surprised, or guess things wrong. I like to be sometimes wrong.
minor complaints:
- I think using polish Ł is pointless, I doubt english speaking readers will get it's not L
- if you are using words like szeptucha, why is 'chief' called by an english word?? he could have been knyaz, vladyka or something like that?
- using: okay, seconds/minutes(but then moons instead of months), cultist, diamond and other words, as well as an egg hunt, pulled me out of the story, it just feels too modern
- using witch as a slur is really boring, i'm sorry, but it is
- also, steppes can be very cold and windy, idk if it did not meant to be a desert instead
- why is Mother and Father written with a capital letter
- switching between english and foreign (fairy and wily) is strange
- there are mentions of real slavic beings (leshy, rusalka, etc.) and then some basic demons... and it felt weird
- most of the names do not feel slavic: Otylia, Adelajda, Jacek, Arleta, Wicenty, Zenobia, Narcyz, Dariusz, Marek, Maryla, Nevenka, Natasza, Serwacy, Genowefa, Lubena, Kajetan, Kuba, Odeta, Zofia, Yuliya... a lot of them are pulled from german/greek/roman/spanish or some other language, when it would probably look better if the names used would be either single-lexeme, or dithematic names of pre-christian slavic origin
I received this book for free in exchange for an honest review.