Présentation Auteurs Détails En France, un nouveau grand clivage idéologico-politique oppose les anti-islamistes aux anti-islamophobes, lesquels sont soit des islamistes, soit des « islamo-gauchistes » – c’est-à-dire des militants ou des activistes d’extrême gauche qui forment des minorités actives, et dont l’influence sur les réseaux sociaux et au sein de l’espace universitaire est inversement proportionnelle au nombre de leurs membres. Ceux qui sont aujourd'hui traités d’« islamophobes » ou accusés de « racisme anti-musulman » répliquent en dénonçant les islamistes ou les « collabos de l’islamisme » qui les accusent. La division des esprits est profonde. Tout se passe comme si les citoyens français n'avaient pas d'autre alternative possible entre être « raciste » ou « collabo », « islamophobe » ou pro-islamiste.
Aussi, comment, dans ce climat social, sortir de ce dilemme ? Comment préserver la liberté d’expression, et plus particulièrement la libre critique des religions, quand, dès lors qu'on défend le principe de laïcité, c'est nécessairement faire preuve d’« islamophobie » (donc d’une certaine forme de racisme) pour les islamistes et ceux qui les soutiennent plus ou moins ouvertement dans les champs politique et culturel ? P.-A. Taguieff nous livre ici sa réflexion sur cette question cruciale de société, de façon simple, accessible et engagée.
Pierre-André Taguieff (born 4 August 1946) is a philosopher and director of research at the French National Centre for Scientific Research in an Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris laboratory, the CEVIPOF. He is also a member of the Cercle de l'Oratoire think tank.
Taguieff is the author of a number of books and papers on racism and antisemitism, including The Force of Prejudice: On Racism and Its Doubles (2001) and Rising from the Muck: The New Antisemitism in Europe (2004). He is known in particular for his studies on the French National Front and populism.
Certainly the most important book about the current situation with Islam / Nazism and woke/far leftleft antisemites..
we can read a lot of quotes from the grand mufti (who translated in Arab the infamous antisemit “protocol of Sion Elders”) begging hitler in 1933 and later, through multiple letters and radio show (he was one of the main propagandist of the reich) to finish the job and how much Nazis are great and how much himmler wish the ottomans would have finish the job in 17th century so there would be no Jews and how much waffen SS Islamist created by the grand mufti were loved by hitler and himmler. And how the grand mufti nazified Islam and how much they were going to fusion. Van Leer, another main propagandist converted to Islam after the war. He was saying how Jews were responsible of the war, and manipulating the whole finance.
Then the second part explain and demonstrate the fusion between anti capitalists and islamists as they share same hate against American capitalists sionism. And how much far left is clearly fusionning happily with antisemit islamists for a long time.
The grand mufti was promoting antisemitism and eradication of Jews way before creation of Israel. Of course. The grand mufti is the one who promoted creation of Palestine as an excuse to gather Muslims around hating Jews. Of course. And co developped that movement with Muslim brotherhood. Of course.
So at the end we see exactly what we see. No bullshit anymore. left collabo allowing torture and ultra a violence proxy against Jewishs. Who is supposed to be humanist? And democrats?
This book help to Ask ourselves, from where is coming the violence and the censorship. Help to get to the right side of History.
Because if you ask yourself what you would have done during WWII, well you would do exactly what you do now. We are in 2024 at the equivalent of 1933. Why? Because that is the date where boycotts of Jewish stores started in Nazi germany. One day before, the grand mufti was sending a letter to Hitler cheering Hitler for this amazing idea and asking and begging how he could help. Yeah, the guy who created the idea of “free Palestine” was more Nazi than Nazis. How to define a Nazi? Someone who will never stop killing Jews in a torture and humiliation way until they disappear from earth. So shall we let them exist? Not even a trial? Offer a state for doing a pogrom? Is it reasonable?
Help to take the red pill.
This book is written by an official French government Historian (CNRS) so it is very seriously and legit written.