Anthologies are odd creatures. Their very nature is both a blessing and a curse.
On the one hand, you're likely to find some tales you'll treasure. On the other, there are bound to be those that fall short of your personal preferences. I mean, no one can please everybody all the time and an anthology with 26 stories can't hit a home run with every one for every reader.
I will also say that I'm a tough critic. Just check out my reviews on Goodreads and you'll see what I mean.
So, let me say that in G IS FOR GHOSTS there were 10 stories that widened my eyes and satisfied my soul. The rest, in varying degrees, didn't live up to my exacting measure of what a good ghost story should be. In a nutshell, I like classic. I like imaginative. I like touching. I like elegant writing. I am not a fan of steampunk, which feels like a tired fad that should be laid to rest. I am not a fan of fandoms. If a story is based on the inside jokes and characters of a particular fandom, it automatically loses all the readers who aren't fans. Lastly, I'm not a fan of stretching to be socially, all-inclusively, politically correct. If a story tries too hard to be so, it generally loses its literary edge.
That, I hope, puts the onus of dislike on me, the reader, rather than the writers (hey, I'm just not your audience...but your audience IS out there...). Now for the gems in this anthology.
C.S. MacCath's story of a mechanical bird imbued with the humanity and integrity which our world today so sorely needs, charmed me. The ghost element was incidental, but the overall effect was heartfelt and lovely.
Alexandra Seidel had me marveling at her sheer skill. The prose was lush with a Victorian feel although the tale was set in modern times. It was an effective portrayal of 'what goes around, comes around.'
Roddy Fosburg's contribution was flash fiction with a beautifully twisted, thought-provoking end.
For me, Andrew Bourelle was the star of the collection. I take notes as I read when I know I'll be reviewing. My notes for Mr. Bourelle's handling of the letter G: "Holy crap! Had to take a break, this was so intense. Ghosts that live within you...not the kind that visit from without." Well worth reading.
The runner-up for me was Lynn Hardaker with the letter N. This was a tale about a sort of traveling-ghost, re-homing, re-haunting service. It was written with elegance and just the right twist of spooky originality. Kudos.
L.S. Johnson gave a story of love, courage and change-about that was exceptional.
Laura VanArendonk Baugh's story was an extraordinarily well-written journey into a psychological maze.
Sarah Van Goethem's work was classic and somewhat predictable, but enjoyable thanks to her unique flair in the writing of it.
Amanda C. Davis handed in a tale that was both timely and darkly hilarious.
And finally, Lilah Wild provided an excellent carny tale, both weird and beautiful.
At the end of the book, I had the feeling that the stories that missed with me didn't flow organically from the writers. It was as if they were handed a homework assignment and struggled to give something that would fit the criteria and earn a passing grade. I don't know the mechanics of these anthologies, but if the authors are chosen ahead of time and assigned a letter of the alphabet, that could explain the qualitative shortfall. Or...I could just be a damn tough critic.
Read it. See what you think. Like most anthologies, there's something for everyone.